Back to Search
Start Over
Prophylactic Antibiotics Delivered Via the Respiratory Tract to Reduce Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Systematic Review, Network Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
- Source :
-
Critical care medicine [Crit Care Med] 2024 Oct 01; Vol. 52 (10), pp. 1612-1623. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 09. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Objectives: To assess the effects of antibiotics delivered via the respiratory tract in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).<br />Data Sources: We searched PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies published in English up to October 25, 2023.<br />Study Selection: Adult patients with mechanical ventilation of over 48 h and receiving inhaled or instilled antibiotics (with control group) to prevent VAP were included.<br />Data Extraction: Two independent groups screened studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to assess the certainty/quality of the evidence. Results of a random-effects model were reported for overall and predefined subgroup meta-analyses. The analysis was primarily conducted on randomized controlled trials, and observational studies were used for sensitivity analyses.<br />Data Synthesis: Seven RCTs with 1445 patients were included, of which six involving 1283 patients used nebulizers to deliver antibiotics. No obvious risk of bias was found among the included RCTs for the primary outcome. Compared with control group, prophylactic antibiotics delivery via the respiratory tract significantly reduced the risk of VAP (risk ratio [RR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.53-0.89]), particularly in subgroups where aminoglycosides (RR, 0.67 [0.47-0.97]) or nebulization (RR, 0.64 [0.49-0.83]) were used as opposed to other antibiotics (ceftazidime and colistin) or intratracheal instillation. No significant differences were observed in mortality, mechanical ventilation duration, ICU and hospital length of stay, duration of systemic antibiotics, need for tracheostomy, and adverse events between the two groups. Results were confirmed in sensitivity analyses.<br />Conclusions: In adult patients with mechanical ventilation for over 48 h, prophylactic antibiotics delivered via the respiratory tract reduced the risk of VAP, particularly for those treated with nebulized aminoglycosides.<br />Competing Interests: Dr. Li’s institution received funding from the Rice Foundation, the American Association for Respiratory Care, Aerogen Ltd, and Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd; she received speaker fees from Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd, the American Association for Respiratory Care, Aerogen Ltd, Heyer Ltd, and Vincent Ltd. Dr. Ehrmann’s institution received funding from Aerogen Ltd, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare and Open AI; he received consultancies from Aerogen Ltd, travel reimbursements from Aerogen Ltd, and Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Administration, Inhalation
Network Meta-Analysis
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Respiration, Artificial adverse effects
Anti-Bacterial Agents administration & dosage
Antibiotic Prophylaxis methods
Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated epidemiology
Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated prevention & control
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1530-0293
- Volume :
- 52
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Critical care medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38722206
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006323