Back to Search Start Over

Effect of Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillators in Nonischemic Heart Failure According to Background Medical Therapy: Extended Follow-up of the DANISH Trial.

Authors :
Yafasova A
Doi SN
Thune JJ
Nielsen JC
Haarbo J
Bruun NE
Gustafsson F
Eiskjær H
Hassager C
Svendsen JH
Høfsten DE
Torp-Pedersen C
Pehrson S
Køber L
Butt JH
Source :
Journal of cardiac failure [J Card Fail] 2024 Nov; Vol. 30 (11), pp. 1411-1420. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 13.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: The Heart Failure Collaboratory (HFC) score integrates types and dosages of guideline-directed pharmacotherapies for heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We examined the effects of cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation according to the modified HFC (mHFC) score in 1116 patients with nonischemic HFrEF from the Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients with Nonischemic Systolic HF on Mortality (DANISH).<br />Methods and Results: Patients were assigned scores for renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors, beta-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (0, no use; 1, < 50% of maximum dosage; 2, ≥ 50% of maximum dosage). The maximum score was 6, corresponding to ≥ 50% of maximum dosage for all therapies. The median baseline mHFC score was 4, and the median follow-up was 9.5 years. Compared with an mHFC score of 3-4, an mHFC score of 1-2 was associated with a higher rate of all-cause death (mHFC = 1-2: adjusted HR 1.67 [95% CI, 1.23-2.28]; mHFC = 3-4, reference; mHFC = 5-6: adjusted HR 1.07 [95% CI, 0.87-1.31]). ICD implantation did not reduce all-cause death compared with control (reference) (HR 0.89 [95% CI, 0.74-1.08]), regardless of mHFC score (mHFC = 1-2: HR 0.98 [95% CI, 0.56-1.71]; mHFC = 3-4: HR 0.89 [95% CI,0.66-1.20]; mHFC = 5-6: HR 0.85 [95% CI, 0.64-1.12]; P <subscript>interaction</subscript> , 0.65). Similarly, ICD implantation did not reduce cardiovascular death (HR 0.87 [95% CI, 0.70-1.09]), regardless of mHFC score (P <subscript>interaction</subscript> , 0.59). The ICD group had a lower rate of sudden cardiovascular death (HR, 0.60 [95% CI,0.40-0.92]); this association was not modified by mHFC score (P <subscript>interaction</subscript> , 0.35).<br />Conclusions: Lower mHFC scores were associated with higher rates of all-cause death. ICD implantation did not result in an overall survival benefit in patients with nonischemic HFrEF, regardless of mHFC score.<br />Competing Interests: Disclosures JJT reports speaker's fees from Astra Zeneca and BMS and travel grants from AstraZeneca. JCN reports grants from the Novo Nordisk Foundation and Danish Heart Foundation outside the submitted work. NEB reports grants from the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the Augustinus Foundation, Health Insurance Denmark, and the Kaj Hansen Foundation, not related to this work. FG is an aAdvisor to Abbott, Ionis, Alnylam, AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Pfizer and is a speaker at Novartis. CH reports research grants from the Novo Nordisk Foundation, Lundbeck Foundation, and the Danish Heart Foundation (not related to this work). JHS reports a research grant from Medtronic (outside of this work) and speaker's fee from Medtronic and is a member of the Advisory Board for Medtronic and for Vital Beats. SP reports a travel grant from Abbott. LK reports speaker's honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer, Novartis, and Novo Nordisk. JHB reports advisory board honoraria from AstraZeneca and Bayer, consultant honoraria from Novartis and AstraZeneca and travel grants from AstraZeneca. All other authors have no disclosures.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-8414
Volume :
30
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of cardiac failure
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38750689
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.04.017