Back to Search
Start Over
Splenic flexure mobilization in left-sided colonic and rectal resections: A meta-analysis and meta-regression of factors associated with anastomotic leak and complications.
- Source :
-
Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland [Colorectal Dis] 2024 Jul; Vol. 26 (7), pp. 1332-1345. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 17. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Aim: Splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) is commonly performed during left-sided colon and rectal resections. The aim of the present systematic review was to assess the outcomes of SFM in left-sided colon and rectal resections and the risk factors for complications and anastomotic leak (AL).<br />Method: This study was a PRISMA-compliant systematic review. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for studies that assessed the outcomes of sigmoid and rectal resections with or without SFM. The primary outcomes were AL and total complications, and the secondary outcomes were individual complications, operating time, conversion to open surgery, length of hospital stay (LOS) and pathological and oncological outcomes.<br />Results: Nineteen studies including data on 81 116 patients (49.1% male) were reviewed. SFM was undertaken in 40.7% of patients. SFM was associated with a longer operating time (weighted mean difference 24.50, 95% CI 14.47-34.52, p < 0.0001) and higher odds of AL (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.06-1.33, p = 0.002). Both groups had similar odds of total complications, splenic injury, anastomotic stricture, conversion to open surgery, (LOS), local recurrence, and overall survival. A secondary analysis of rectal cancer cases only showed similar outcomes for SFM and the control group.<br />Conclusions: SFM was associated with a longer operating time and higher odds of AL, yet a similar likelihood of total complications, splenic injury, anastomotic stricture, conversion to open surgery, LOS, local recurrence, and overall survival. These conclusions must be cautiously interpreted considering the numerous study limitations. SFM may have only been selectively undertaken in cases in which anastomotic tension was suspected. Therefore, the suboptimal anastomoses may have been the reason for SFM rather than the SFM being causative of the anastomotic insufficiencies.<br /> (© 2024 The Author(s). Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Risk Factors
Female
Male
Proctectomy adverse effects
Proctectomy methods
Rectum surgery
Middle Aged
Anastomosis, Surgical adverse effects
Anastomosis, Surgical methods
Aged
Rectal Neoplasms surgery
Postoperative Complications etiology
Postoperative Complications epidemiology
Anastomotic Leak etiology
Anastomotic Leak epidemiology
Colon, Transverse surgery
Colectomy adverse effects
Colectomy methods
Length of Stay statistics & numerical data
Operative Time
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1463-1318
- Volume :
- 26
- Issue :
- 7
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38757843
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.16983