Back to Search
Start Over
Predictors of prolonged length of stay after elective carotid revascularization.
- Source :
-
Journal of vascular surgery [J Vasc Surg] 2024 Oct; Vol. 80 (4), pp. 1120-1130. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 17. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Objective: Postoperative day-one discharge is used as a quality-of-care indicator after carotid revascularization. This study identifies predictors of prolonged length of stay (pLOS), defined as a postprocedural LOS of >1 day, after elective carotid revascularization.<br />Methods: Patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA), transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) in the Vascular Quality Initiative between 2016 and 2022 were included in this analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of pLOS, defined as a postprocedural LOS of >1 day, after each procedure.<br />Results: A total of 118,625 elective cases were included. pLOS was observed in nearly 23.2% of patients undergoing carotid revascularization. Major adverse events, including neurological, cardiac, infectious, and bleeding complications, occurred in 5.2% of patients and were the most significant contributor to pLOS after the three procedures. Age, female sex, non-White race, insurance status, high comorbidity index, prior ipsilateral CEA, non-ambulatory status, symptomatic presentation, surgeries occurring on Friday, and postoperative hypo- or hypertension were significantly associated with pLOS across all three procedures. For CEA, additional predictors included contralateral carotid artery occlusion, preoperative use of dual antiplatelets and anticoagulation, low physician volume (<11 cases/year), and drain use. For TCAR, preoperative anticoagulation use, low physician case volume (<6 cases/year), no protamine use, and post-stent dilatation intraoperatively were associated with pLOS. One-year analysis showed a significant association between pLOS and increased mortality for all three procedures; CEA (hazard ratio [HR],1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49-1.82), TCAR (HR,1.56; 95% CI, 1.35-1.80), and TFCAS (HR, 1.33; 95%CI, 1.08-1.64) (all P < .05).<br />Conclusions: A postoperative LOS of more than 1 day is not uncommon after carotid revascularization. Procedure-related complications are the most common drivers of pLOS. Identifying patients who are risk for pLOS highlights quality improvement strategies that can optimize short and 1-year outcomes of patients undergoing carotid revascularization.<br />Competing Interests: Disclosures H.A. is a 2022-2023 trainee in the Society for Vascular Surgery Patient Safety Organization Quality Fellowship in Training (FIT) program. M.M. has an educational grant from Silk Road Medical to the University of California, San Diego, outside the submitted work. G.W. is a member of the Women of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization advisory board. R.L.M. is a principal investigator for the Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Transcarotid Artery Revascularization study. No other competing interests were reported.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Female
Male
Aged
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Retrospective Studies
Middle Aged
Risk Assessment
Aged, 80 and over
Carotid Artery Diseases surgery
Carotid Artery Diseases mortality
Carotid Artery Diseases therapy
Carotid Stenosis surgery
Carotid Stenosis diagnostic imaging
Databases, Factual
Quality Indicators, Health Care
United States
Elective Surgical Procedures
Length of Stay
Endarterectomy, Carotid adverse effects
Postoperative Complications etiology
Postoperative Complications therapy
Stents
Endovascular Procedures adverse effects
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1097-6809
- Volume :
- 80
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of vascular surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38763455
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.022