Back to Search Start Over

Standard versus fractionated high-dose cisplatin plus radiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer: Results of the CisFRad (GORTEC 2015-02) randomized phase II trial.

Authors :
Borel C
Sun XS
Coutte A
Bera G
Sire C
Zanetta S
Alfonsi M
Janoray G
Chatellier T
Garcia-Ramirez M
Gherga E
Hammoud Y
Burgy M
Etienne-Selloum N
Pechery A
Girard-Calais MH
Velten M
Pignon JP
Wanneveich M
Bourhis J
Source :
Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology [Radiother Oncol] 2024 Aug; Vol. 197, pp. 110329. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 19.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Chemoradiotherapy with high-dose cisplatin (HD-Cis: 100 mg/m <superscript>2</superscript> q3w for three cycles) is the standard of care (SOC) in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). Cumulative delivered dose of cisplatin is prognostic of survival, even beyond 200 mg/m <superscript>2</superscript> but high toxicity compromises its delivery.<br />Aim: Cisplatin fractionation may allow, by decreasing the peak serum concentration, to decrease toxicity. To date, no direct comparison was done of HD-Cis versus fractionated high dose cisplatin (FHD-Cis).<br />Methods: This is a multi-institutional randomized phase II trial, stratified on postoperative or definitive chemoradiotherapy, comparing HD-Cis to FHD-Cis (25 mg/m <superscript>2</superscript> /d d1-4 q3w for 3 cycles) in patients with LA-HNSCC. The primary endpoint was the cumulative delivered cisplatin dose.<br />Results: Between December 2015 and April 2018, 124 patients were randomized. Median cisplatin cumulative delivered dose was 291 mg/m <superscript>2</superscript> (IQR: 251;298) in the FHD-Cis arm and 274 mg/m <superscript>2</superscript> (IQR: 198;295) in the HD-Cis arm (P = 0.054). The proportion of patients receiving a third cycle of cisplatin was higher, with a lower proportion of grade 3-4 acute AEs in the FHD-Cis arm compared to the HD-Cis arm: 81 % vs. 64 % (P = 0.04) and 10 % vs. 17 % (P = 0.002), respectively. With a median follow-up of 48 months (IQR: 41;55), locoregional failure rate, PFS and OS were similar between the two arms.<br />Conclusion: Although the primary endpoint was not met, FHD-Cis allowed more cycles of cisplatin to be delivered with lower toxicity, when compared to SOC. FHD-Cis concurrently with RT is a treatment option which deserves further consideration.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-0887
Volume :
197
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38768714
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110329