Back to Search Start Over

Geographic diversity in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the PROGRESS-CTO registry.

Authors :
Alexandrou M
Rempakos A
Mutlu D
Al Ogaili A
Choi JW
Poommipanit P
Alaswad K
Basir MB
Davies R
Jaffer FA
Chandwaney RH
Azzalini L
Aygul N
ElGuindy AM
Jefferson BK
Gorgulu S
Khatri JJ
Krestyaninov O
Khelimskii D
Frizzell J
Elbarouni B
Goktekin O
McEntegart MB
Rangan BV
Mastrodemos OC
Burke MN
Sandoval Y
Brilakis ES
Source :
The Journal of invasive cardiology [J Invasive Cardiol] 2024 May 22. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 22.
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

Background: There is variability in clinical and lesion characteristics as well as techniques in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).<br />Methods: We analyzed patient and lesion characteristics, techniques, and outcomes in 11 503 CTO-PCI procedures performed in North America (NA) and in the combined regions of Europe, Asia, and Africa from 2017 to 2023 as documented in the PROGRESS-CTO registry.<br />Results: Eight thousand four hundred seventy-nine (74%) procedures were performed in NA. Compared with non-NA patients, NA patients were older, with higher body mass index and higher prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, family history of coronary artery disease, prior history of PCI, coronary artery bypass graft surgery and heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral arterial disease. Their CTOs were more complex, with higher J-CTO (2.56 ± 1.22 vs 1.81 ± 1.24; P less than .001) and PROGRESS-CTO (1.29 ± 1.01 vs 1.07 ± 0.95; P less than .001) scores, longer length, and higher prevalence of proximal cap ambiguity, blunt/no stump, moderate to severe calcification, and proximal tortuosity. Retrograde (31.0% vs 22.1%; P less than .001) and antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR) (21.2% vs 9.2%; P less than .001) were more commonly used in NA centers, along with intravascular ultrasound (69.0% vs 10.1%; P less than .001). Procedure and fluoroscopy times were longer in NA, while contrast volume and radiation dose were lower. Technical (86.7% vs 86.8%; P > .90) and procedural (85.4% vs 85.8%; P = .70) success and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (1.9% vs 1.7%; P = .40) were similar in NA and non-NA centers.<br />Conclusions: Compared with non-NA patients, NA patients undergoing CTO PCI have more comorbidities, higher CTO lesion complexity, are more likely to undergo treatment with retrograde and ADR, and have similar technical success and MACE.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1557-2501
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Journal of invasive cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38776473
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/24.00056