Back to Search Start Over

Three-Year Outcomes With Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided or Angiography-Guided Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Myocardial Infarction.

Authors :
Puymirat E
Cayla G
Simon T
Steg PG
Montalescot G
Durand-Zaleski I
Ngaleu Siaha F
Gallet R
Khalife K
Morelle JF
Motreff P
Lemesle G
Dillinger JG
Lhermusier T
Silvain J
Roule V
Labèque JN
Rangé G
Ducrocq G
Cottin Y
Blanchard D
Charles Nelson A
Djadi-Prat J
Chatellier G
Danchin N
Source :
Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions [Circ Cardiovasc Interv] 2024 Jun; Vol. 17 (6), pp. e013913. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 24.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: In patients with multivessel disease with successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, the FLOWER-MI trial (Flow Evaluation to Guide Revascularization in Multivessel ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) showed that a fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided strategy was not superior to an angiography-guided strategy for treatment of noninfarct-related artery lesions regarding the 1-year risk of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent revascularization. The extension phase of the trial was planned using the same primary outcome to determine whether a difference in outcomes would be observed with a longer follow-up.<br />Methods: In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease with successful percutaneous coronary intervention of the infarct-related artery to receive complete revascularization guided by either FFR (n=586) or angiography (n=577).<br />Results: After 3 years, a primary outcome event occurred in 52 of 498 patients (9.40%) in the FFR-guided group and in 44 of 502 patients (8.17%) in the angiography-guided group (hazard ratio, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.79-1.77]; P =0.4). Death occurred in 22 patients (4.00%) in the FFR-guided group and in 23 (4.32%) in the angiography-guided group (hazard ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.53-1.71]); nonfatal myocardial infarction in 23 (4.13%) and 14 (2.56%), respectively (hazard ratio, 1.63 [95% CI, 0.84-3.16]); and unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent revascularization in 21 (3.83%) and 18 (3.36%; hazard ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.61-2.16]), respectively.<br />Conclusions: Although event rates in the trial were lower than expected, in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing complete revascularization, an FFR-guided strategy did not have a significant benefit over an angiography-guided strategy with respect to the risk of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization up to 3 years.<br />Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02943954.<br />Competing Interests: Disclosures None.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1941-7632
Volume :
17
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38785084
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013913