Back to Search
Start Over
Stent sizing by coronary CT angiography compared with optical coherence tomography.
- Source :
-
Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography [J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr] 2024 Jul-Aug; Vol. 18 (4), pp. 337-344. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 23. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is well-established for diagnosis and stratification of coronary artery disease (CAD). Its usefulness in guiding percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and stent sizing is unknown.<br />Methods: This is a sub-analysis of the Precise Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Plan (P3) study (NCT03782688). We analyzed 65 vessels with matched CCTA and pre-PCI optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessment. The CCTA-guided stent size was defined by the mean distal reference lumen diameter rounded up to the nearest stent diameter. The OCT lumen-guided stent size was the mean distal reference lumen diameter rounded to the closest stent diameter. The agreement on stent diameters was determined with Kappa statistics, Passing-Bablok regression analysis, and the Bland-Altman method.<br />Results: The distal reference lumen diameter by CCTA and OCT were 2.75 ± 0.53 mm and 2.72 ± 0.55 mm (mean difference 0.06, limits of agreement -0.7 to 0.82). There were no proportional or systematic differences (coefficient A 1.06, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.3 and coefficient B -0.22, 95% CI -0.83 to 0.36) between methods. The agreement between the CCTA and OCT stent size was substantial (Cohen's weighted Kappa 0.74, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.85). Compared to OCT stent diameter, CCTA stent size was concordant in 52.3% of the cases; CCTA overestimated stent size in 20.0% and underestimated in 27.7%.<br />Conclusion: CCTA accurately assessed the reference vessel diameter used for stent sizing. CCTA-based stent sizing showed a substantial agreement with OCT. CCTA allows for PCI planning and may aid in selecting stent diameter.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest TM reports receiving consulting fees from Zeon Medical and HeartFlow Inc, and speaker fees from Abbott Vascular. BLN has received an unrestricted institutional research grant from HeartFlow Inc. MM is supported by a grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant NNF22OC0074083). BKK received an Institutional Research Grant from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific Corporation, and Philips. BDB reports receiving consultancy fees from Boston Scientific and Abbott Vascular, research grants from Coroventis Research, Pie Medical Imaging, CathWorks, Boston Scientific, Siemens, HeartFlow Inc, and Abbott Vascular, and owning equity in Siemens, GE, Philips, HeartFlow Inc, Edwards Life Sciences, Bayer, Sanofi, Celyad. CC reports receiving research grants from Biosensor, Coroventis Research, Medis Medical Imaging, Pie Medical Imaging, CathWorks, Boston Scientific, Siemens, HeartFlow Inc, Abbott Vascular, and consultancy fees from HeartFlow Inc, OpSens, Abbott Vascular, and Philips Volcano. The other authors have no further disclosures.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Male
Female
Reproducibility of Results
Middle Aged
Aged
Tomography, Optical Coherence
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Disease diagnostic imaging
Coronary Artery Disease therapy
Computed Tomography Angiography
Predictive Value of Tests
Coronary Vessels diagnostic imaging
Stents
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention instrumentation
Prosthesis Design
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1876-861X
- Volume :
- 18
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38789325
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2024.03.002