Incidence of postoperative venous thromboembolism in patients with vulvar carcinoma undergoing vulvectomy with or without lymphadenectomy.

Objectives: The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following radical surgery for vulvar carcinoma remains poorly characterized, and recommendations for postoperative chemoprophylaxis are varied. Our objective was to assess the incidence of postoperative VTE in patients undergoing surgery for vulvar carcinoma and to determine if VTE incidence differs by radical vulvectomy with or without lymph node assessment.
Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients with a diagnosis of vulvar cancer undergoing radical vulvectomy with or without lymph node assessment from 2012 to 2020. Clinical characteristics and 30-day incidence of VTE as well as other postoperative outcomes were abstracted. Variables were compared using Chi-square test and Fischer's exact test, as well as Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon rank sum tests where appropriate.
Results: A total of 1672 patients underwent radical vulvectomy for vulvar carcinoma. 11 patients (0.7%) experienced postoperative VTE within 30 days of surgery. The incidence of VTE was similar when radical vulvectomy was performed alone or with lymph node dissection by any method (p = 0.116). Longer operative times (p = 0.033) and greater postoperative length of stay (p = 0.001) were associated with increased risk of postoperative VTE.
Conclusions: The incidence of postoperative VTE is low in patients undergoing radical vulvar surgery in this national cohort. Inguinofemoral lymph node dissection by any method does not appear to be a risk factor for VTE when compared to radical vulvectomy alone. Further research is needed to determine if extended VTE prophylaxis is beneficial in this population.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflicts of interest of financial disclosures. The author (Ellen Hartenbach) is an Editorial Board Member for Gynecologic Oncology and was not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)