Back to Search Start Over

Reliability of transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked responses on knee extensor muscles during cycling.

Authors :
Zhang J
McClean ZJ
Khaledi N
Morgan SJ
Millet GY
Aboodarda SJ
Source :
Experimental brain research [Exp Brain Res] 2024 Jul; Vol. 242 (7), pp. 1681-1695. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 28.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures the excitability and inhibition of corticomotor networks. Despite its task-specificity, few studies have used TMS during dynamic movements and the reliability of TMS paired pulses has not been assessed during cycling. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of motor evoked potentials (MEP) and short- and long-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI and LICI) on vastus lateralis and rectus femoris muscle activity during a fatiguing single-leg cycling task. Nine healthy adults (2 female) performed two identical sessions of counterweighted single-leg cycling at 60% peak power output until failure. Five single pulses and ten paired pulses were delivered to the motor cortex, and two maximal femoral nerve stimulations (M <subscript>max</subscript> ) were administered during two baseline cycling bouts (unfatigued) and every 5 min throughout cycling (fatigued). When comparing both baseline bouts within the same session, MEP·M <subscript>max</subscript> <superscript>-1</superscript> and LICI (both ICC: >0.9) were rated excellent while SICI was rated good (ICC: 0.7-0.9). At baseline, between sessions, in the vastus lateralis, M <subscript>max</subscript> (ICC: >0.9) and MEP·M <subscript>max</subscript> <superscript>-1</superscript> (ICC: 0.7) demonstrated good reliability; LICI was moderate (ICC: 0.5), and SICI was poor (ICC: 0.3). Across the fatiguing task, M <subscript>max</subscript> demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC > 0.8), MEP·M <subscript>max</subscript> <superscript>-1</superscript> ranged good to excellent (ICC: 0.7-0.9), LICI was moderate to excellent (ICC: 0.5-0.9), and SICI remained poorly reliable (ICC: 0.3-0.6). These results corroborate the cruciality of retaining mode-specific testing measurements and suggest that during cycling, M <subscript>max</subscript> , MEP·M <subscript>max</subscript> <superscript>-1</superscript> , and LICI measures are reliable whereas SICI, although less reliable across days, can be reliable within the same session.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1432-1106
Volume :
242
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Experimental brain research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38806709
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06859-y