Back to Search Start Over

A multicenter retrospective observational NAPOLEON2 study of nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors :
Kodama T
Imajima T
Shimokawa M
Otsuka T
Kawahira M
Nakazawa J
Hori T
Shibuki T
Arima S
Ido A
Miwa K
Okabe Y
Koga F
Ueda Y
Kubotsu Y
Shimokawa H
Takeshita S
Nishikawa K
Komori A
Otsu S
Hosokawa A
Sakai T
Sakai K
Oda H
Kawahira M
Arita S
Honda T
Taguchi H
Tsuneyoshi K
Kawaguchi Y
Fujita T
Sakae T
Shirakawa T
Mizuta T
Mitsugi K
Source :
Scientific reports [Sci Rep] 2024 May 30; Vol. 14 (1), pp. 12422. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 30.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid (NFF) is a standard regimen after gemcitabine-based therapy for patients with unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer. However, there are limited clinical data on its efficacy and safety in the real-world. We therefore initiated a retrospective and prospective observational study (NAPOLEON-2). The results of the retrospective part were reported herein. In this retrospective study, we evaluated 161 consecutive patients who received NFF as second-or-later-line regimen. The main endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the other endpoints were response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), dose intensity, and adverse events (AEs). The median age was 67 years (range, 38-85 years). The median OS and PFS were 8.1 and 3.4 months, respectively. The objective response and disease control rates were 5% and 52%, respectively. The median relative dose intensity was 81.6% for nanoliposomal irinotecan and 82.9% for fluorouracil. Grade 3 or 4 hematological and nonhematological AEs occurred in 47 and 42 patients, respectively. Common grade 3 or 4 AEs included neutropenia (24%), anorexia (12%), and leukocytopenia (12%). Subanalysis of patients treated with second-line and third-or-later-line demonstrated no statistical significant difference in OS (7.6 months vs. 9.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.35; pā€‰=ā€‰0.68). In conclusion, NFF has acceptable efficacy and safety profile even in real-world clinical settings. The prospective study is in progress to validate these findings.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2045-2322
Volume :
14
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Scientific reports
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38816500
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-63172-y