Epinephrine Dosing Intervals Are Associated With Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes: A Multicenter Study.

Objectives: Data to support epinephrine dosing intervals during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are conflicting. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between epinephrine dosing intervals and outcomes. We hypothesized that dosing intervals less than 3 minutes would be associated with improved neurologic survival compared with greater than or equal to 3 minutes.
Design: This study is a secondary analysis of The ICU-RESUScitation Project (NCT028374497), a multicenter trial of a quality improvement bundle of physiology-directed CPR training and post-cardiac arrest debriefing.
Setting: Eighteen PICUs and pediatric cardiac ICUs in the United States.
Patients: Subjects were 18 years young or younger and 37 weeks old or older corrected gestational age who had an index cardiac arrest. Patients who received less than two doses of epinephrine, received extracorporeal CPR, or had dosing intervals greater than 8 minutes were excluded.
Interventions: The primary exposure was an epinephrine dosing interval of less than 3 vs. greater than or equal to 3 minutes.
Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was survival to discharge with a favorable neurologic outcome defined as a Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score of 1-2 or no change from baseline. Regression models evaluated the association between dosing intervals and: 1) survival outcomes and 2) CPR duration. Among 382 patients meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria, median age was 0.9 years (interquartile range 0.3-7.6 yr) and 45% were female. After adjustment for confounders, dosing intervals less than 3 minutes were not associated with survival with favorable neurologic outcome (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.10; 95% CI, 0.84-1.46; p = 0.48) but were associated with improved sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (aRR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.07-1.37; p < 0.01) and shorter CPR duration (adjusted effect estimate, -9.5 min; 95% CI, -14.4 to -4.84 min; p < 0.01).
Conclusions: In patients receiving at least two doses of epinephrine, dosing intervals less than 3 minutes were not associated with neurologic outcome but were associated with sustained ROSC and shorter CPR duration.
Competing Interests: Drs. Kienzle, Berg, Morgan, Reeder, Carcillo, Carpenter, Hall, Horvat, Franzon, Frazier, Friess, Maa, Manga, McQuillen, Meert, Mourani, Naim, Pollack, Sapru, Schnieter, Wolfe, and Sutton received National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant funding to their institution related to this project. Dr. Kienzle disclosed the study was supported by the NIH Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD; U01HD049934, UG1HD049981, UG1HD049983, UG1HD050096, UG1HD063108, UG1HD083166, UG1HD083170, and UG1HD083171) and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI; R01HL131544 and K23HL148541) and by the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute Resuscitation Science Center. Dr. Berg reports membership on Data Safety Monitoring Boards. Dr. Carcillo received funding from the NICHD and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences. Dr. Diddle received funding from Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Friess received funding for expert testimony. Drs. Berg’s and Maa’s institutions received funding from the NHLBI. Drs. Berg, Carpenter, Horvat, and McQuillen institutions received funding from the NICHD. Drs. Morgan and Sutton report volunteer leadership roles with the American Heart Association. Dr. Morgan’s institution received funding from the NHLBI (K23HL148541). Dr. Hall received funding from the American Board of Pediatrics, AbbVie, Kiadis, Partner Therapeutics, and Sobi. Dr. Nadkarni receives unrestricted research grants to his institution from the NIH, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Department of Defense, Zoll Medical, Nihon Kohden, Resuscitation Quality Improvement Partners, American Heart Association, and Laerdal Foundation. He serves as the president of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM). The views expressed are his, and not intended to represent the views of the SCCM. Dr. Wolfe received funding for speaking fees. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
(Copyright © 2024 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.)