Back to Search Start Over

Ultrasound backscatter coefficient for fat quantification is affected by the measurement depth.

Authors :
Ferraioli G
De Silvestri A
Torres G
Barr RG
Source :
Abdominal radiology (New York) [Abdom Radiol (NY)] 2024 Aug; Vol. 49 (8), pp. 2622-2628. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 04.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: It has been reported that the estimate of ultrasound attenuation coefficient (AC) is affected by depth of measurement, with linear decrease of values with depth. It is unknown whether backscatter coefficient (BSC) has similar behavior.<br />Methods: This retrospective study was performed with Sequoia US system equipped with ultrasound derived fat fraction (UDFF) algorithm (Siemens Healthineers, Issaquah, WA, USA) that combines BSC with AC. UDFF was obtained positioning upper edge of the region of interest at 1.5,2,3,4,5 cm below liver capsule. BSC data were extracted from UDFF offline. A fractional polynomial regression, which selects the best model considering the polynomial development of the variables of interest, was used. Covariates included were age, sex, skin-to-liver-capsule distance, stiffness. Distance was included as linear factor or with a power ranging from - 2 to 3, and the best fitting model was chosen according to partial F test. Body mass index (BMI) was not included because of collinearity with skin-to-liver capsule distance.<br />Results: 104 individuals (56 females; age: 57.9 ± 13.0 years; BMI: 29.0 ± 6.5 kg/m <superscript>2</superscript> ; skin-to-liver-capsule distance: 2.3 ± 0.7 cm; liver stiffness: 7.5 ± 5.5 kiloPascal) were studied. Best fitting model for BSC included a combination of depth as linear factor and square root. BSC showed a decrease of - 13.98 dB/cm-steradian for each logarithmic increase of 1 cm depth (coefficient: - 13.98; 95% CI: - 21.016; - 5.379; p = .001). Skin-to-liver-capsule distance and stiffness also were independent predictors of BSC.<br />Conclusions: The estimation of the BSC in the liver exhibits a depth dependence that significantly affects results. A standardized acquisition protocol is needed to compare results and reliably assess changes over time.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2366-0058
Volume :
49
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Abdominal radiology (New York)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38834778
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04413-6