Back to Search Start Over

Emotional Distress Symptoms, Coping Efficacy, and Social Support: A Network Analysis of Distress and Resources in Persons With Cancer.

Authors :
Chirico A
Palombi T
Alivernini F
Lucidi F
Merluzzi TV
Source :
Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine [Ann Behav Med] 2024 Oct 16; Vol. 58 (10), pp. 679-691.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: The study's main aim was to analyze the structure and configuration of distress symptoms and resource factors.<br />Purpose: Common methods of assessing distress symptoms in cancer patients (i) do not capture the configuration of individual distress symptoms and (ii) do not take into account resource factors (e.g., social support, coping, caring health professionals). Network analysis focuses on the configuration and relationships among symptoms that can result in tailored interventions for distress. Network analysis was used to derive a symptom-level view of distress and resource factors.<br />Methods: Nine hundred and ninety-two cancer patients (mixed diagnoses) completed an abridged Distress Screening Schedule that included 24 items describing symptoms related to distress (depression, anxiety) and resource factors (social support, coping, caring health professionals).<br />Results: In network analysis, the centrality strength index (CSI) is the degree to which an item is connected to all other items, thus constituting an important focal point in the network. A depression symptom had the highest CSI value: felt lonely/isolated (CSI = 1.30). In addition, resource factors related to coping efficacy (CSI = 1.20), actively seeking support (CSI = 1.10), perceiving one's doctor as caring (CSI = 1.10), and receiving social support (CSI = 1.10) also all had very high CSI scores.<br />Conclusions and Implications: These results emphasize the integral importance of the social symptoms of loneliness/isolation in distress. Thus, distress symptoms (loneliness) and resource factors (coping efficacy, seeking social support, and perceiving medical professionals as caring) should be integral aspects of distress management and incorporated into assessment tools and interventions to reduce distress.<br /> (© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2024. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our siteā€”for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-4796
Volume :
58
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38865355
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaae025