Back to Search Start Over

Can we encourage the endoscopic treatment for external snapping hip (ESH)? A systematic review of current concepts.

Authors :
Giai Via R
Elzeiny A
Pantè S
De Vivo S
Massè A
Giachino M
Source :
European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie [Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol] 2024 Aug; Vol. 34 (6), pp. 2835-2844. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 14.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Snapping hip syndrome (SHS) is characterized by snapping sensation and pain and affects up to 10% of the general population. External snapping hip syndrome (ESHS), the most common form, is often due to repetitive movements in sports or anatomical predispositions. Conservative treatment includes physiotherapy and corticosteroid injections, while surgery is considered if conservative measures fail. Open surgical techniques carry several risks, while modern arthroscopic techniques offer less invasive options, such as endoscopic iliotibial band release (ITB) and gluteus maximus tenotomy.<br />Materials and Methods: A systematic review was conducted adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant studies were searched in four databases: Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, and Medline. The selected articles were evaluated according to the criteria of levels of evidence. The Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to analyze the retrospective studies. This paper was registered in the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO).<br />Results: Out of 9 included studies, 403 patients with 689 hips underwent endoscopic treatment. ITB release and his variations were the main surgical techniques. Gluteus maximus tenotomy was also used in some studies. Postoperative rehabilitation protocols varied. Patients generally experienced significant improvements in symptoms and functional outcomes, with low rates of recurrence (1.02%) and revision (0.15%). Complications were minimal.<br />Conclusions: Endoscopic treatment of ESH shows favorable results, improving functional outcomes and returning patients to pre-injury activity levels. Long-term efficacy and costeffectiveness need to be evaluated, emphasizing the importance of large-scale prospective randomized trials to clarify surgery's benefits in refractory ESH cases.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1432-1068
Volume :
34
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38874780
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-04030-5