Back to Search Start Over

A global survey on the use of the international classification of diseases codes for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease.

Authors :
Zhang H
Targher G
Byrne CD
Kim SU
Wong VW
Valenti L
Glickman M
Ponce J
Mantzoros CS
Crespo J
Gronbaek H
Yang W
Eslam M
Wong RJ
Machado MV
Yu ML
Ghanem OM
Okanoue T
Liu JF
Lee YH
Xu XY
Pan Q
Sui M
Lonardo A
Yilmaz Y
Zhu LY
Moreno C
Miele L
Lupsor-Platon M
Zhao L
LaMasters TL
Gish RG
Zhang H
Nedelcu M
Chan WK
Xia MF
Bril F
Shi JP
Datz C
Romeo S
Sun J
Liu D
Sookoian S
Mao YM
Méndez-Sánchez N
Wang XY
Pyrsopoulos NT
Fan JG
Fouad Y
Sun DQ
Giannini C
Chai J
Xia ZF
Jun DW
Li GJ
Treeprasertsuk S
Li YX
Cheung TT
Zhang F
Goh GB
Furuhashi M
Seto WK
Huang H
Di Sessa A
Li QH
Cholongitas E
Zhang L
Silveira TR
Sebastiani G
Adams LA
Chen W
Qi X
Rankovic I
De Ledinghen V
Lv WJ
Hamaguchi M
Kassir R
Müller-Wieland D
Romero-Gomez M
Xu Y
Xu YC
Chen SY
Kermansaravi M
Kuchay MS
Lefere S
Parmar C
Lip GYH
Liu CJ
Åberg F
Lau G
George J
Sarin SK
Zhou JY
Zheng MH
Source :
Hepatology international [Hepatol Int] 2024 Aug; Vol. 18 (4), pp. 1178-1201. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 15.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: With the implementation of the 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) and the publication of the metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) nomenclature in 2020, it is important to establish consensus for the coding of MAFLD in ICD-11. This will inform subsequent revisions of ICD-11.<br />Methods: Using the Qualtrics XM and WJX platforms, questionnaires were sent online to MAFLD-ICD-11 coding collaborators, authors of papers, and relevant association members.<br />Results: A total of 890 international experts in various fields from 61 countries responded to the survey. We also achieved full coverage of provincial-level administrative regions in China. 77.1% of respondents agreed that MAFLD should be represented in ICD-11 by updating NAFLD, with no significant regional differences (77.3% in Asia and 76.6% in non-Asia, p = 0.819). Over 80% of respondents agreed or somewhat agreed with the need to assign specific codes for progressive stages of MAFLD (i.e. steatohepatitis) (92.2%), MAFLD combined with comorbidities (84.1%), or MAFLD subtypes (i.e., lean, overweight/obese, and diabetic) (86.1%).<br />Conclusions: This global survey by a collaborative panel of clinical, coding, health management and policy experts, indicates agreement that MAFLD should be coded in ICD-11. The data serves as a foundation for corresponding adjustments in the ICD-11 revision.<br /> (© 2024. Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1936-0541
Volume :
18
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Hepatology international
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38878111
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-024-10702-5