Discrepancies between two total IgE assays and difference in reference intervals in healthy adults.

Objective: To compare total immunoglobulin (Ig) E assay performance characteristics between Abbott Architect and Siemens Immulite test systems. Reference intervals were also determined for both platforms in an American population of healthy adults.
Methods: Agreement of the two total IgE assays was evaluated in a cohort of 331 subjects with normal complete blood count (CBC) and comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) results. Reference intervals were established in 302 subjects after exclusion of atopic individuals on the Abbott Architect and Siemens Immulite test systems.
Results: We demonstrated a 32% positive bias for total IgE quantitation on the Siemens Immulite platform compared to the Abbott Architect, despite both methods calibrated against the same WHO international reference material (75/502), Furthermore, the upper limit of the reference interval (95th percentile) was determined to be higher for the Siemens Immulite assay compared to the Abbott Architect (132 and 102 IU/mL, respectively).
Conclusion: Despite the use of a common WHO reference material for total IgE assay calibration, significant differences in quantitation was observed between two FDA-cleared test systems. Given that, it is warranted for clinical laboratories to verify vendor established reference intervals and adjust accordingly based on internal assessment of the normal range.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None.
(Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)