Back to Search Start Over

A Retrospective Cohort Study of Patient Risk Factors and Pelvic Venous Reflux Patterns on Treatment Outcomes With Pelvic Vein Embolisation.

Authors :
Strong SM
Cross AC
Sideris M
Whiteley MS
Source :
Vascular and endovascular surgery [Vasc Endovascular Surg] 2024 Oct; Vol. 58 (7), pp. 733-741. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 22.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: To identify the effects of patient risk factors and pelvic venous reflux (PVR) patterns on treatment outcomes of Pelvic Vein Embolisation (PVE) for Pelvic Venous Disorder (PeVD).<br />Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort review assessing population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) for women undergoing PVE for PVR January 2017-January 2021. We identified 190 patients who had completed both questionnaires and who had given consent for their information to be used for research (Median age 46, IQR 40-52). The distribution of pathological pelvic venous reflux found on transvaginal duplex ultrasound (TVDUS) was analysed for all patients. Pre- and post-procedure symptom burden scores were studied using a standardised questionnaire protocol. We used inferential univariate non-parametric statistics to describe our data.<br />Results: 190 cases were reviewed; 62.6% (119/190) premenopausal, 11.1% (21/190) perimenopausal, 25.3% (48/190) postmenopausal and menopausal status not documented 1% (2/190). 10.1% (19/188) were nulliparous (average age 34 years; range 20-55 years). There was a statistically significant improvement in all symptoms and in the appearance of varicosities on TVDUS post-PVE ( P < 0.05) of the ovarian vein plexus, uterus plexus, arcuate veins, vaginal wall, peri-urethral, peri-anal, haemorrhoids, labial and proximal thigh. The locations of veins requiring embolisation having demonstrated reflux were analysed; 82.8% (154/186) underwent embolisation of at least one internal iliac vein tributary and ovarian vein embolisation. Age, parity, menopausal status and previous laparoscopy did not affect symptom improvement ( P > 0.05). No significant complications such as coil migration were observed.<br />Conclusions: PVE is an effective treatment for pelvic pain due to PeVD and its diagnosis should not be limited to multiparous women of childbearing age, as a significant proportion of patients who benefited from PVE were either nulliparous and/or postmenopausal.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1938-9116
Volume :
58
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Vascular and endovascular surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38907671
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744241264312