Back to Search Start Over

Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis Estimates the Minimal Detectable Change of the Geriatric Depression Scale-15.

Authors :
González-Domínguez NP
Wu Y
Fan S
Levis B
Sun Y
Gilbody S
Ioannidis JPA
Harel D
Vigod SN
Markham S
Ziegelstein RC
Cuijpers P
Patten SB
Boruff JT
Thombs BD
Benedetti A
Source :
Journal of clinical epidemiology [J Clin Epidemiol] 2024 Jun 26, pp. 111443. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 26.
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

Objective: To use individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) to estimate the minimal detectable change (MDC) of the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15) and to examine whether MDC may differ based on participant characteristics and study-level variables.<br />Study Design and Setting: This was a secondary analysis of data from an IPDMA on the depression screening accuracy of the GDS. Datasets from studies published in any language were eligible for the present study if they included GDS-15 scores for participants aged 60 or older. MDC of the GDS-15 was estimated via random-effects meta-analysis using 2.77 (MDC95) and 1.41 (MDC67) standard errors of measurement (SEM). Subgroup analyses were used to evaluate differences in MDC by participant age and sex. Meta-regression was conducted to assess for differences based on study-level variables, including mean age, proportion male, proportion with major depression, and recruitment setting.<br />Results: 5,876 participants (mean age 76 years, 40% male, 11% with major depression) from 21 studies were included. The MDC95 was 3.81 points (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.59, 4.04), and MDC67 was 1.95 (95% CI 1.83, 2.03). The difference in MDC95 was 0.26 points (95% CI 0.04, 0.48) between ≥ 80-year-olds and < 80-year-olds; MDC95 was similar for females and males (0.05, 95% CI -0.12, 0.22). The MDC95 increased by 0.29 points (95% CI 0.17, 0.41) per 10% increase in proportion of participants with major depression; mean age had a small association (0.04 points, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.09) with MDC95, but sex and recruitment setting were not significantly associated.<br />Conclusions: The MDC95 was 3.81 points and MDC67 was 1.95 points. MDC95 increased with the proportion of participants with major depression. Results can be used to evaluate individual changes in depression symptoms and as a threshold for assessing minimal clinical important difference estimates.<br /> (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1878-5921
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of clinical epidemiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38942179
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111443