Back to Search
Start Over
Clinical efficacy of EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis versus EUS-guided celiac ganglion irradiation with iodine-125 seeds for pain relief in advanced pancreatic cancer: A long-term retrospective study.
- Source :
-
Endoscopic ultrasound [Endosc Ultrasound] 2024 Mar-Apr; Vol. 13 (2), pp. 100-106. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Apr 04. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background and Objective: To compare the efficacy of EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) and celiac plexus irradiation with iodine-125 ( <superscript>125</superscript> I) seeds with absolute ethanol for relieving pain in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.<br />Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of 81 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who underwent EUS-CPN or EUS- <superscript>125</superscript> I implantation between January 2017 and December 2020. Postoperative pain was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) scores; self-assessments of quality of life and the median survival time were compared between the 2 groups.<br />Results: EUS-CPN and <superscript>125</superscript> I implantation were performed in 43 and 38 patients, respectively. Postoperative VAS scores were significantly lower than the preoperative levels in both groups. One week after the operation, 26 patients (60.5%) in the EUS-CPN group achieved partial pain relief, whereas no patients in the EUS- <superscript>125</superscript> I seed group experienced pain relief. However, after 4 weeks postoperatively, VAS scores had decreased, and the rate of partial pain relief was higher for EUS- <superscript>125</superscript> I seeds than for EUS-CPN. Self-assessments of quality of life were similar in both groups during the first 1 month after the procedure.<br />Conclusions: Both EUS-CPN and EUS- <superscript>125</superscript> I seeds can safely and effectively relieve pain in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Although EUS- <superscript>125</superscript> I seeds take additional time to show effects, the extent and duration of pain relief are better compared with CPN, and interestingly, the median survival time was different.<br />Competing Interests: Zhen-Dong Jin is an Associate Editor of the journal. This article was subject to the journal's standard procedures, with peer review handled independently of the editor and his research group.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc on behalf of Scholar Media Publishing.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2303-9027
- Volume :
- 13
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Endoscopic ultrasound
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38947749
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000048