Back to Search Start Over

Assessment of hard and soft tissue thickness at mandibular symphysis in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical patterns.

Authors :
Oh J
Ham LK
Shin H
Han SH
Kim Y
Source :
Orthodontics & craniofacial research [Orthod Craniofac Res] 2024 Dec; Vol. 27 (6), pp. 886-892. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 02.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to assess the bony and soft tissue parameters at mandibular symphysis among skeletal Class III patients with different vertical growth patterns, using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).<br />Materials and Methods: CBCT images of 60 skeletal Class III non-growing patients were evaluated (mean age 24.9 ± 8.4 years). Study samples were classified into three facial types based on the mandibular plane angle (SN-MP angle): low, normal, and high angle. The bony and soft tissue parameters at the mandibular symphysis were evaluated.<br />Results: Among hard tissue variables, symphysis and pogonion width were significantly narrower in the high-angle group (P < .05). The thickness of the buccal cortex at pogonion was also significantly thinner in subjects with high angles (P < .01). Symphysis height showed an increasing tendency from the low-angle to the high-angle group. However, no significant differences were found in chin width and height according to vertical patterns. Across all soft tissue measurements, the low-angle group exhibited the highest thickness, which gradually decreased in the high-angle group. Statistically significant differences in soft tissue thickness were observed at Menton (Me) and Gnathion (Gn) (P < .05). A significant negative correlation was observed between the SN-MP angle and the thickness of both hard and soft tissues.<br />Conclusions: In skeletal Class III subjects, significant differences existed in both hard and soft tissues at the mandibular symphysis, depending on the vertical patterns. These results provide a comprehensive evaluation of symphyseal area, which can aid clinicians in identifying appropriate treatment approaches, especially for combined orthognathic and orthodontic treatment.<br /> (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1601-6343
Volume :
27
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Orthodontics & craniofacial research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38953566
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12829