Back to Search
Start Over
Cannabis and anhedonia: A systematic review.
- Source :
-
Psychiatry research [Psychiatry Res] 2024 Sep; Vol. 339, pp. 116041. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 14. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- This paper employs a systematic review to examine the correlation between anhedonia and marijuana use, exploring whether individuals with anhedonia use marijuana as a coping mechanism or if marijuana use plays a role in the onset of anhedonia. The search utilised PubMed and Web of Science databases, following PRISMA guidelines for paper selection. A total of 21 papers were selected to address this inquiry, and assessments were carried out using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Exposures (ROBINS-E) tool. The results revealed that 17 studies exhibited moderate and low risk of bias. The evaluation encompassed a total of 12,427 participants, including both animals and humans. Experimental animal studies focused on exploring the association between cannabidiol (CBD) and anhedonia, while human studies primarily employed observational research, examining various forms of anhedonia in individuals with or without mental disorders such as depression or psychosis. These studies also delved into understanding the effects of anhedonia during adolescence and explored the causal relationship between these concepts. The findings indicate a reciprocal rather than unidirectional relationship, establishing that initial anhedonia predisposes individuals to cannabis use, and subsequent consumption significantly intensifies the anhedonia experienced. Particularly, the studies placed special emphasis on adolescents and individuals with mental disorders.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None<br /> (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1872-7123
- Volume :
- 339
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Psychiatry research
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38959579
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116041