Cite
Response to letter to "Patient Impression of Improvement 1 year After Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage 2 or Higher".
MLA
Stoter, Lisa M., et al. “Response to Letter to ‘Patient Impression of Improvement 1 Year After Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage 2 or Higher.’” International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 35, no. 7, July 2024, pp. 1557–58. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05862-9.
APA
Stoter, L. M., Notten, K. J. B., & Kluivers, K. B. (2024). Response to letter to “Patient Impression of Improvement 1 year After Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage 2 or Higher.” International Urogynecology Journal, 35(7), 1557–1558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05862-9
Chicago
Stoter, Lisa M, Kim J B Notten, and Kirsten B Kluivers. 2024. “Response to Letter to ‘Patient Impression of Improvement 1 Year After Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage 2 or Higher.’” International Urogynecology Journal 35 (7): 1557–58. doi:10.1007/s00192-024-05862-9.