Back to Search Start Over

The influence of tibial length on radiographic posterior tibial slope measurement: How much tibia do we need?

Authors :
Garra S
Li ZI
Triana J
Savage-Elliott I
Moore MR
Kanakamedala A
Campbell K
Alaia M
Strauss EJ
Jazrawi LM
Source :
The Knee [Knee] 2024 Aug; Vol. 49, pp. 167-175. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 08.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether significant differences exist when comparing posterior tibial slope (PTS) measured using increasing lengths of the tibia to determine the anatomical axis.<br />Methods: Patients with full-length weight-bearing tibial radiographs were retrospectively identified from 2014 to 2022 at a single institution. Patients were excluded if there was any previous history of lower extremity fracture or osteotomy. The anatomical axis of the tibia was determined using the full length of tibial radiographs, and the "reference PTS" was measured using this axis. Using the same radiograph, the PTS was measured using four different anatomical axes at standardized tibial lengths. While the center of the proximal circle remained constant at 5-cm below the tibial plateau, the center of the distal circle was drawn at four points: a) overlapping circles; b) 10-cm distal to the tibial plateau; c) 15-cm distal to the tibial plateau; d) half the length of the tibia, measured from the tibial plateau to the tibial plafond. Bivariate correlation and frequency distribution analysis (measurements >2-degrees from reference PTS) were performed between the reference PTS and PTS measured at each of the four other lengths.<br />Results: A total of 154 patients (39.8 ± 17.4 years old, 44.2% male) were included in the final analysis. Measurements at each of the four tibial lengths were all significantly different from the reference PTS (p < 0.001). The correlation strength improved with increasing tibial length (overlapping: R = 0.681, 10-cm: R = 0.821, 15-cm: R = 0.937, and half-tibia: R = 0.963). The number of PTS measurements >2-degree absolute difference from the reference PTS decreased with increasing tibial length (overlapping: 40.3%, 10-cm: 24.0%, 15-cm: 26.0%, and half-tibia: 18.8%).<br />Conclusion: Assessment of PTS is dependent on the length of the tibia utilized to obtain the anatomical axis. Accuracy and precision of PTS measurements improved with increasing length of tibia used to determine the anatomical axis.<br />Study Design: Case series.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-5800
Volume :
49
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Knee
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
38981280
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2024.06.005