Performance of Purpose-Built vs Off-Label Transcatheter Devices for Aortic Regurgitation: The PURPOSE Study.

Background: Severe pure aortic regurgitation (AR) carries a high mortality and morbidity risk, and it is often undertreated because of the inherent surgical risk. Transcatheter heart valves (THVs) have been used off-label in this setting with overall suboptimal results. The dedicated "purpose-built" Jena Valve Trilogy (JVT, JenaValve Technology) showed an encouraging performance, although it has never been compared to other THVs.
Objectives: The aim of our study was to assess the performance of the latest iteration of THVs used off-label in comparison to the purpose-built JVT in inoperable patients with severe AR.
Methods: We performed a multicenter, retrospective registry with 18 participating centers worldwide collecting data on inoperable patients with severe AR of the native valve. A bicuspid aortic valve was the main exclusion criterion. The primary endpoints were technical and device success, 1-year all-cause mortality, and the composite of 1-year mortality and the heart failure rehospitalization rate.
Results: Overall, 256 patients were enrolled. THVs used off-label were used in 168 cases (66%), whereas JVT was used in 88 (34%). JVT had higher technical (81% vs 98%; P < 0.001) and device success rates (73% vs 95%; P < 0.001), primarily driven by significantly lower incidences of THV embolization (15% vs 1.1%; P < 0.001), the need for a second valve (11% vs 1.1%; P = 0.004), and moderate residual AR (10% vs 1.1%; P = 0.007). The permanent pacemaker implantation rate was comparable and elevated for both groups (22% vs 24%; P = 0.70). Finally, no significant difference was observed at the 1-year follow-up in terms of mortality (HR: 0.99; P = 0.980) and the composite endpoint (HR: 1.5; P = 0.355).
Conclusions: The JVT platform has a better acute performance than other THVs when used off-label for inoperable patients with severe AR. A longer follow-up is conceivably needed to detect a possible impact on prognosis.
Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study has been performed at IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, a clinical research hospital partially funded by the Italian Ministry of Health. Dr Adam has received grants and personal fees from Medtronic; and has received personal fees from JenaValve, Edwards Lifesciences, and Boston Scientific. Dr Wienemann has received travel grants from JenaValve. Dr Panoulas has received consultancy fees for Medtronic; and has served as a proctor for Medtronic. Dr Taramasso has received consultancy fees from Abbott, Edwards Lifescience, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Shenqi Medical, PiCardia, CoreMedic, CoreQuest, MEDIRA, Simulands, and VentriMend; and serves on the Advisory Boards for Abbott and HiD Imaging. Dr Baldus has received lecture fees from JenaValve; and has received lecture and speaker fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Baumbach has received speaker/consultant fees from Medtronic, Biotronik, Meril, Sinomed, and Microport; and is a proctor for JenaValve. Dr Rudolph has received consultancy fees/speaker honoraria from Abbott, JenaValve, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Testa is a proctor/consultant for Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Meril; and has received speaker honoraria from Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Meril.
(Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)