Back to Search
Start Over
Efficacy and safety of regorafenib as a first-line agent alone or in combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.
- Source :
-
Journal of gastrointestinal oncology [J Gastrointest Oncol] 2024 Jun 30; Vol. 15 (3), pp. 1072-1081. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 27. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background: The RESORCE-III trial demonstrated that advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who progressed on sorafenib and had second-line therapy with regorafenib improved overall survival compared with placebo. Later, immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with antiangiogenetic antibodies has evolved as the preferred first-line treatment for fit patients. We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of regorafenib as a first-line agent alone or in combination with ICIs in patients with advanced HCC.<br />Methods: We identified 50 patients with advanced HCC treated with regorafenib as a first-line agent. Two patients were lost to follow-up and excluded. Baseline factors, dosing, concomitant use of ICIs, toxicity and outcome of treatment were recorded from electronic medical records.<br />Results: Twenty-six patients received regorafenib as monotherapy and twenty-two received regorafenib + ICI in combination. In the total cohort, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 7.7 months and the median overall survival (mOS) was 16.7 months (P=0.02). Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 were 21% and 73%. In the regorafenib monotherapy group, mPFS was 5.9 months, and mOS was 13.9 months; in the combination group, mPFS was 7.8 months, and mOS was 23.6 months. ORR and DCR were 15% and 65% in the monotherapy group, and 27% and 82% in the combined treatment group, respectively.<br />Conclusions: Regorafenib used in combination with ICIs had a mild safety profile and resulted in improved response and an almost doubling of mOS compared to monotherapy, warranting further prospective evaluation in a randomized study.<br />Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jgo-24-315/coif). M.L. reports research funding by Scandion Oncology A/S, Denmark. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.<br /> (2024 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2078-6891
- Volume :
- 15
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of gastrointestinal oncology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 38989425
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-24-315