A Comparative Study on the Efficacy Between Cystatin C and Creatinine-Based Equations for Early Detection of Renal Damage in Patients of Eastern India.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the leading causes of mortality across the globe. Early diagnosis of the disease is important in order to prevent the adverse outcome related to CKD. Many laboratories adopt creatinine-based e-GFR equations which yields imprecise results leading to misdiagnosis of CKD. Emerging studies indicated cystatin C as a better renal marker than creatinine. The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of CKD epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine e-GFR equations with (CKD EPI) cystatin-based e-GFR equations alone and in combination with creatinine for early detection of CKD. A cross-sectional study employing 473 patients was conducted. Three estimating GFR equations were calculated based on creatinine and cystatin C. Pearson Correlation study was done to assess the correlation of creatinine and cystatin C with their respective GFRs. A predictive model was developed, and ROC curve was constructed to compare efficacy, sensitivity and specificity of the creatinine and cystatin C based equations. Cystatin C exhibited better negative correlation with GFR than creatinine in correlation study performed with three commonly employed eGFR equations including  CKD EPI Creatine cystatin C combined  equation (2021), cys C alone and CKD EPI  creatinine (2021)  equations respectively[r=(-) 0.801 vs. r=(-)0.786 vs. r=(-)0.773]. Predictive model demonstrated highest efficiency, sensitivity and specificity for creatinine-cystatin C combined equation (88%, 81% and 93%) followed by cystatin C alone equation (73%,63% and 82%) and creatinine-based equation  (61%, 56% and 66% respectively). The study showed better performance of cystatin C based equations for early detection of advance stages in chronic kidney disease as compared to creatinine-based e-GFR equation.
Competing Interests: Conflict of interestThe authors declare no conflict of interest for this study.
(© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Association of Clinical Biochemists of India 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.)