Back to Search Start Over

Publication Trends in Aesthetic Breast Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors :
Rupra RS
Daneshi K
Liyanage D
Ceccaroni A
Gentile A
Khajuria A
Source :
Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum [Aesthet Surg J Open Forum] 2024 Jun 10; Vol. 6, pp. ojae045. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 10 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Aesthetic breast surgery (ABS) encompasses breast augmentation, breast reduction, mastopexy, and mastopexy augmentation. This topic has seldom been assessed as a bibliometric study. This analysis aims to address this gap and identify trends in ABS literature to guide future research areas. Bibliometrics, the quantitative analysis of publications, particularly scholarly literature, offers valuable insights into research trends and impact.<br />Objectives: This analysis aims to address this gap and identify trends in ABS literature to guide future research areas.<br />Methods: The 100 most-cited publications in ABS were identified on Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA), across all available journal years (from 1953 to 2024). Study details, including the citation count, main content focus, and outcome measures, were extracted and tabulated from each publication. The Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine and levels of evidence (LOE) of each study were assessed.<br />Results: The 100 most-cited publications in ABS were cited by a total of 11,522 publications. Citations per publication ranged from 46 to 1211 (mean 115.2 ± 135.7), with the highest-cited study being the Pusic BREAST-Q paper ( n = 1211). A majority of publications were LOE 4 ( n = 30), representative of the large number of case series. The number of publications for LOE 5, 3, 2, and 1 was 12, 28, 21, and 9, respectively. The main content focus was "outcomes" in 52 publications, followed by "nonoperative management" ( n = 12) and "surgical technique" ( n = 12). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were used in 29 publications, and 53 publications reported aesthetic outcome measures.<br />Conclusions: This analysis highlights that research methodologies in ABS studies should be improved. This necessary improvement would be facilitated by vigorous, high-quality research, and the implementation of validated ABS-specific PROMs enhancing patient satisfaction, particularly in aesthetic procedures, such as BREAST-Q.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Aesthetic Society.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2631-4797
Volume :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39015114
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojae045