Cite
Immediate vs delayed venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following spine surgery: increased rate of unplanned reoperation for postoperative hematoma with immediate prophylaxis.
MLA
Lambrechts, Mark J., et al. “Immediate vs Delayed Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Following Spine Surgery: Increased Rate of Unplanned Reoperation for Postoperative Hematoma with Immediate Prophylaxis.” The Spine Journal : Official Journal of the North American Spine Society, vol. 24, no. 11, Nov. 2024, pp. 2019–25. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.06.568.
APA
Lambrechts, M. J., Toci, G. R., Issa, T. Z., Narayanan, R., Lee, Y., Schaefer, J., Hilibrand, A. S., Vaccaro, A. R., Harrop, J. S., Schroeder, G. D., & Kepler, C. K. (2024). Immediate vs delayed venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following spine surgery: increased rate of unplanned reoperation for postoperative hematoma with immediate prophylaxis. The Spine Journal : Official Journal of the North American Spine Society, 24(11), 2019–2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.06.568
Chicago
Lambrechts, Mark J, Gregory R Toci, Tariq Z Issa, Rajkishen Narayanan, Yunsoo Lee, Joseph Schaefer, Alan S Hilibrand, et al. 2024. “Immediate vs Delayed Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Following Spine Surgery: Increased Rate of Unplanned Reoperation for Postoperative Hematoma with Immediate Prophylaxis.” The Spine Journal : Official Journal of the North American Spine Society 24 (11): 2019–25. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2024.06.568.