Back to Search Start Over

Supportive care interventions in metastatic bone disease: scoping review.

Authors :
Simister SK
Bhale R
Cizik AM
Wise BL
Thorpe SW
Ferrell B
Randall RL
Fauer A
Source :
BMJ supportive & palliative care [BMJ Support Palliat Care] 2024 Jul 22. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 22.
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

Background: Patients with secondary metastatic involvement of the musculoskeletal system due to primary cancers are a rapidly growing population with significant risks for health-related end-of-life morbidities. In particular, bone metastases or metastatic bone disease (MBD) imparts significant adversity to remaining quality of life. No rigorous review of clinical trials on the use of supportive care interventions for MBD has been conducted. The objective of this review was to examine the characteristics of supportive care interventions for MBD and critically appraise study designs, key findings, and quality of evidence of the research.<br />Methods: We searched for published clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses in PubMED, CINAHL and Google Scholar for articles published between September 2017 and September 2022. Some examples of Medical Subject Headings terms were: 'secondary neoplasm', 'metastatic bone disease', 'palliative care' and 'supportive care intervention'. Quality of published evidence was evaluated based on treatment types and study design.<br />Results: After reviewing 572 publications, 13 articles were included in the final review and evaluation including seven clinical trials, two trial protocols and four systematic reviews. Feasible interventions included enhanced palliative care consultation, palliative radiotherapy and alternative medicines. Interventions addressed primary endpoints of fatigue (N=4, 31%), pain (N=3, 23%) or cancer-related symptoms (N=3, 23%) with patient-reported outcome instruments. No interventions reported on fracture complications or endpoints, specifically. The quality of most studies was moderate to strong.<br />Conclusion: Supportive care interventions for MBD are feasible and the impact is measurable via patient-reported outcome measures. While the evidence for interventions was moderate to strong, there are very few specific controlled trials for skeletal-related events and impacts of social determinants of health. Further clinical trials are needed to define supportive care interventions for MBD that demonstrate reduced risk of fracture and that mitigate the reduced quality of life when negative musculoskeletal outcomes arise.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: AF is supported in part by the UC Davis Paul Calabresi Career Development Program for Clinical Oncology funded by the National Cancer Institute/National Institutes of Health (5K12-CA138464).<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2045-4368
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMJ supportive & palliative care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39038991
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-004965