Back to Search Start Over

Nephrectomies in Saudi Arabia: A Comprehensive Analysis of Outcomes from a High-Volume Minimally Invasive Surgery Center.

Authors :
Alasker A
Alnafisah TR
Shafqat A
Sabbah BN
Alaswad M
Alghafees M
Alhaider A
Alsayyari A
Althonayan N
Al-Otaibi M
Ofisan SB
Alharbi MG
Alsaikhan B
Al-Khayal A
Source :
Journal of kidney cancer and VHL [J Kidney Cancer VHL] 2024 Jul 18; Vol. 11 (3), pp. 1-12. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 18 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Literature reporting on the outcomes of the different procedures of nephrectomies (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic) in Saudi Arabia remains limited. Compare surgical and oncological outcomes between open and minimally invasive nephrectomies. A retrospective cohort study. The present study included all adult patients who underwent nephrectomies between January 1, 2015 and January 31, 2023. We collected demographic, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data on 408 adult cancer patients who underwent nephrectomies at our center between January 2015 and January 2023. Statistical differences were calculated between procedure types. Overall survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Measures of operative success (intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and hospital stay) and oncological outcomes (local recurrence, metastatic progression, and chemotherapy use) between different procedure and nephrectomy types for cancer patients. A total of 408 cancer patients underwent nephrectomies. In cancer patients, open nephrectomy was associated with significantly higher intraoperative blood loss (p<0.001), incidence of blood transfusions (p<0.001), hospital stay (p<0.001), intraoperative complications (p=0.027 and p=0.001, respectively), local recurrence (p<0.001), metastatic progression (p=0.001), and chemotherapy (p=0.001) than minimally invasive surgery, but survival differences across procedure types were not statistically significant (log-rank p-value = 0.054). Regarding nephrectomy type, significant differences were observed in tumor size (p < 0.001), initial procedure type (p<0.001), operation time (p<0.001), blood transfusion (p=0.033), length of hospital stay (p=0.004), intraoperative complications (p=0.020), postoperative complications (p=0.025), Clavien classification (p=0.003), mortality (p=0.022), metastatic progression (p<0.001), and chemotherapy use (p=0.001) between simple/total nephrectomy, radical nephrectomy (RN), partial nephrectomy (PN), and nephroureterectomy. Survival differences between the four nephrectomy types were statistically significant (log-rank p value = 0.001). Minimally invasive nephrectomies reduce inpatient morbidity while conferring equivalent oncological and surgical outcomes.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.<br /> (Copyright: Sabbah B.N., et al.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2203-5826
Volume :
11
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of kidney cancer and VHL
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39045259
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i3.332