The Megacomplex protects ER-alpha from degradation by Fulvestrant in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Ovarian cancer, a significant contributor to cancer-related mortality, exhibits limited responsiveness to hormonal therapies targeting the estrogen receptor (ERα). This study aimed to elucidate the mechanisms behind ERα resistance to the therapeutic drug Fulvestrant (ICI182780 or ICI). Notably, compared to the cytoplasmic version, nuclear ERα was minimally degraded by ICI, suggesting a mechanism for drug resistance via the protective confines of the nuclear substructures. Of these substructures, we identified a 1.3 MDa Megacomplex comprising transcription factors ERα, FOXA1, and PITX1 using size exclusion chromatography (SEC) in the ovarian cancer cell line, PEO4. ChIP-seq revealed these factors colocalized at 6775 genomic positions representing sites of Megacomplex formation. Megacomplex ERα exhibited increased resistance to degradation by ICI compared to cytoplasmic and nuclear ERα. A small molecule inhibitor of active chromatin and super-enhancers, JQ1, in combination with ICI significantly enhanced ERα degradation from Megacomplex as revealed by SEC and ChIP-seq. Interestingly, this combination degraded both the cytoplasmic as well as nuclear ERα. Pathway enrichment analysis showed parallel results for RNA-seq gene sets following Estradiol, ICI, or ICI plus JQ1 treatments as those defined by Megacomplex binding identified through ChIP-seq. Furthermore, similar pathway enrichments were confirmed in mass-spec analysis of the Megacomplex macromolecule fractions after modulation by Estradiol or ICI. These findings implicate Megacomplex in ERα-driven ovarian cancer chromatin regulation. This combined treatment strategy exhibited superior inhibition of cell proliferation and viability. Therefore, by uncovering ERα's resistance within the Megacomplex, the combined ICI plus JQ1 treatment elucidates a novel drug treatment vulnerability.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Published by Elsevier B.V.)