Back to Search Start Over

Effectiveness of a virtual quality improvement training program to improve reach of weight management programs within a large health system.

Authors :
Damschroder LJ
Evans R
Kim HM
Sussman J
Freitag MB
Robinson CH
Burns JA
Yankey NR
Lowery JC
Source :
Health services research [Health Serv Res] 2024 Jul 25. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 25.
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

Objective: To test effectiveness of the LEAP (Learn Engage Act Process) Program on engaging frontline Veteran Health Administration (VHA) medical center teams in continuous quality improvement (QI), a core capability for learning health systems.<br />Data Sources and Study Setting: Data sources included VHA electronic health record (EHR) data, surveys, and LEAP coaching field notes.<br />Study Design: A staggered difference-in-differences study was conducted. Fifty-five facilities participated in LEAP across eight randomly assigned clusters of 6-8 facilities per cluster over 2 years. Non-participating facilities were used as controls. A MOVE! weight management program team completed a Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle of change supported by learning curriculum, coaching, and virtual collaboratives in LEAP facilities. Primary outcome was program reach to Veterans. A mixed-effects model compared pre- versus post-LEAP periods for LEAP versus control facilities. LEAP adherence, satisfaction, and cost to deliver LEAP were evaluated.<br />Data Collection/extraction Methods: Thirty months of facility-level EHR MOVE! enrollment data were included in analyses. LEAP Satisfaction and QI skills were elicited via surveys at baseline and 6-month post-LEAP.<br />Principal Findings: Fifty-five facilities were randomly assigned to eight time-period-based clusters to receive LEAP (71% completed LEAP) and 82 non-participating facilities were randomly assigned as controls. Reach in LEAP and control facilities was comparable in the 12-month pre-LEAP period (p = 0.07). Though LEAP facilities experienced slower decline in reach in the 12-month post-LEAP period compared with controls (p < 0.001), this is likely due to unexplained fluctuations in controls. For LEAP facilities, satisfaction was high (all mean ratings >4 on a 5-point scale), self-reported use of QI methods increased significantly (p-values <0.05) 6 months post-LEAP, and delivery cost was $4024 per facility-based team.<br />Conclusion: Control facilities experienced declining reach in the 12-month post-LEAP period, but LEAP facilities did not, plus they reported higher engagement in QI, an essential capability for learning health systems.<br /> (© 2024 The Author(s). Health Services Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Health Research and Educational Trust.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1475-6773
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Health services research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39054798
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14344