Back to Search
Start Over
First-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of efficacy and safety.
- Source :
-
Urologic oncology [Urol Oncol] 2024 Nov; Vol. 42 (11), pp. 374.e21-374.e29. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 31. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapy is a standard systemic treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Although differential pharmacologic action between ICI+ICI and ICI+tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combinations may affect outcomes, comparative studies using real-world data are few.<br />Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 447 mRCC patients treated with 1st-line ICI-based combinations at multiple institutions between January 2018 and August 2023, and selected 320 patients diagnosed with clear cell RCC (ccRCC) for further study. Cohorts were matched using one-to-one propensity scores based on IMDC risk classification. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORRs), and treatment-related adverse events (TrAE) were compared.<br />Results: The matching process yielded 228 metastatic ccRCC patients treated with ICI+ICI (n = 114) or ICI+TKI (n = 114). Median OS was 53 months (95%CI: 33-NA) in patients treated with ICI+ICI and was not reached (95%CI: 43-NA) with ICI+TKI (P = 0.24). Median PFS was significantly shorter for ICI+ICI (13 months, 95%CI: 7-25) than for ICI+TKI (25 months, 95%CI: 13-NA) (P = 0.047). There were no differences in second-line PFS for sequential therapy after 1st-line combinations of ICI+ICI or ICI+TKI (6 vs. 8 months, P = 0.6). There were no differences in ORR between the 2 groups (ICI+ICI: 51% vs. ICI+TKI: 55%, P = 0.8); the progressive disease (PD) rate was significantly higher in patients treated with the ICI+ICI combination (24% vs. 11%, P = 0.029). The rate of any grade TrAE was significantly higher in patients treated with ICI+TKI (71% vs. 85%, P = 0.016), but we found no differences in severe TrAE between the 2 groups (39% vs. 36%, P = 0.8).<br />Conclusions: In a matched cohort of real-world data, we confirmed comparable OS benefits between ICI+ICI and ICI+TKI combinations. However, differential clinical behaviors in terms of PFS, PD rates, and TrAE between ICI-based combinations may enrich clinical decision-making.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Takahiro Kimura is a paid consultant/advisor of Astellas, Bayer, Janssen, Sanofi and Takeda. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Male
Female
Retrospective Studies
Middle Aged
Aged
Treatment Outcome
Adult
Protein Kinase Inhibitors therapeutic use
Protein Kinase Inhibitors adverse effects
Aged, 80 and over
Carcinoma, Renal Cell drug therapy
Carcinoma, Renal Cell mortality
Kidney Neoplasms drug therapy
Kidney Neoplasms pathology
Propensity Score
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors therapeutic use
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1873-2496
- Volume :
- 42
- Issue :
- 11
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Urologic oncology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 39085019
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.06.013