Back to Search Start Over

First-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of efficacy and safety.

Authors :
Yanagisawa T
Mori K
Kawada T
Katayama S
Uchimoto T
Tsujino T
Nishimura K
Adachi T
Toyoda S
Nukaya T
Fukuokaya W
Urabe F
Murakami M
Yamanoi T
Bekku K
Komura K
Takahara K
Hashimoto T
Fujita K
Azuma H
Ohno Y
Shiroki R
Uemura H
Araki M
Kimura T
Source :
Urologic oncology [Urol Oncol] 2024 Nov; Vol. 42 (11), pp. 374.e21-374.e29. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 31.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapy is a standard systemic treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Although differential pharmacologic action between ICI+ICI and ICI+tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combinations may affect outcomes, comparative studies using real-world data are few.<br />Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 447 mRCC patients treated with 1st-line ICI-based combinations at multiple institutions between January 2018 and August 2023, and selected 320 patients diagnosed with clear cell RCC (ccRCC) for further study. Cohorts were matched using one-to-one propensity scores based on IMDC risk classification. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORRs), and treatment-related adverse events (TrAE) were compared.<br />Results: The matching process yielded 228 metastatic ccRCC patients treated with ICI+ICI (n = 114) or ICI+TKI (n = 114). Median OS was 53 months (95%CI: 33-NA) in patients treated with ICI+ICI and was not reached (95%CI: 43-NA) with ICI+TKI (P = 0.24). Median PFS was significantly shorter for ICI+ICI (13 months, 95%CI: 7-25) than for ICI+TKI (25 months, 95%CI: 13-NA) (P = 0.047). There were no differences in second-line PFS for sequential therapy after 1st-line combinations of ICI+ICI or ICI+TKI (6 vs. 8 months, P = 0.6). There were no differences in ORR between the 2 groups (ICI+ICI: 51% vs. ICI+TKI: 55%, P = 0.8); the progressive disease (PD) rate was significantly higher in patients treated with the ICI+ICI combination (24% vs. 11%, P = 0.029). The rate of any grade TrAE was significantly higher in patients treated with ICI+TKI (71% vs. 85%, P = 0.016), but we found no differences in severe TrAE between the 2 groups (39% vs. 36%, P = 0.8).<br />Conclusions: In a matched cohort of real-world data, we confirmed comparable OS benefits between ICI+ICI and ICI+TKI combinations. However, differential clinical behaviors in terms of PFS, PD rates, and TrAE between ICI-based combinations may enrich clinical decision-making.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Takahiro Kimura is a paid consultant/advisor of Astellas, Bayer, Janssen, Sanofi and Takeda. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-2496
Volume :
42
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Urologic oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39085019
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.06.013