Comparison Between Resident and Attending Surgeons as Assistants on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: No Differences in Outcomes, Complications Rate, or Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objective: The aim of the present study was to determine if the level of training of the first assistant (resident or attending surgeon) has an influence on the radiographic outcome of AIS surgery and on the accuracy rate of the pedicle screws placement.
Summary of Background Data: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery is a challenging procedure that requires a dedicated team of skilled professionals. Therefore, understanding the learning curve is of outstanding importance to guarantee the best outcomes and the highest safety to the patients.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent surgery for AIS with a minimum follow-up of 2 years was conducted. All patients were operated by an experienced spine surgeon, assisted by and attending surgeon (group A) or a senior resident (group B). Radiographic outcomes were assessed. Through postoperative CT scan, accuracy of pedicle screw placement was measured (using Gertzbein-Robbins classification). Groups were then statistically compared.
Results: A total of 120 patients were included (mean age 15.3±3.39 y, major curve Cobb 60.7±11.9 degrees). No difference was found between groups in terms of preoperative characteristics and postoperative radiographic (correction rate, thoracic kyphosis, screw density) outcomes or complications. Operative time and estimated blood loss were significantly higher in Group B (P=0.045 and P=0.024, respectively). Of the 2746 pedicle screws inserted (1319 group A and 1427 group B), 2452 had a perfect intrapedicular trajectory (absolute accuracy of 89.29%) and 2697 had a breach <2 mm (relative accuracy of 97.56%). No difference was found among groups in terms of absolute or relative accuracy (P=0.06 and P=0.23, respectively).
Conclusions: AIS cases assisted by senior residents have longer operative time and higher blood loss, but this does not negatively affect the overall radiographic outcome and does not place the patient at increased risk of complications.
Level of Evidence: III.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
(Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)