Back to Search Start Over

Utility of serial troponin testing for emergency department patients with syncope.

Authors :
Leafloor CW
McRae AD
Mercier E
Yan JW
Huang P
Mukarram M
Rowe BH
Ishimwe AC
Hegdekar M
Sivilotti MLA
Taljaard M
Nemnom MJ
Thiruganasambandamoorthy V
Source :
CJEM [CJEM] 2024 Aug; Vol. 26 (8), pp. 535-542. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 02.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: For emergency department (ED) patients with syncope, cardiac troponin can identify acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and prognosticate for 30-day serious adverse events. However, it is unclear if serial testing improves diagnostic yield and prognostication.<br />Methods: This was a secondary analysis of data from two prospective studies conducted to develop the Canadian Syncope Risk Score. Adults (age ≥ 16 years) with syncope were enrolled, and patient characteristics, vital signs, physician diagnostic impression, electrocardiogram and troponin results, and adjudicated 30-day serious adverse event were collected. The primary outcome was the detection of a serious adverse event within 30 days of ED disposition. The secondary outcome was comparison of ED length of stay among patients with single versus serial troponin measurements.<br />Results: 4996 patients [mean age 64.5 (SD 18.8) years, 52.2% male] were included: 4397 (89.8%) with single troponin [232 (5.3%) with serious adverse event in the ED and 203 (4.6%) after ED disposition]; 499 (10.2%) patients with > 1 troponin measurement [39 (7.8%) with serious adverse event in ED and 60 (12.0%) after ED disposition]. Among those with serial measurements, 10 patients (2.0%) had a rise from below to above the 99th percentile threshold, of whom 4 patients (0.8%) suffered serious adverse event: two with arrhythmias diagnosed on electrocardiogram, one with ACS and one suffered respiratory failure. Nine patients (1.8%) had Canadian Syncope Risk Score risk reclassification based on serial measurement, and none suffered 30-day serious adverse event. Median ED length of stay was significantly longer for patients with serial testing (5.6 vs. 3.8 h, p < 0.001).<br />Conclusions: The initial troponin measurement was sufficient for serious adverse event detection and in-ED risk stratification. Serial troponin testing does not improve the diagnostic yield or prognostication and should be reserved for patients with ongoing symptoms or electrocardiogram findings suggestive of cardiac ischemia.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP)/ Association Canadienne de Médecine d'Urgence (ACMU).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1481-8043
Volume :
26
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
CJEM
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39095575
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00740-1