Back to Search Start Over

Development and initial evaluation of a clinical prediction model for risk of treatment resistance in first-episode psychosis: Schizophrenia Prediction of Resistance to Treatment (SPIRIT).

Authors :
Farooq S
Hattle M
Kingstone T
Ajnakina O
Dazzan P
Demjaha A
Murray RM
Di Forti M
Jones PB
Doody GA
Shiers D
Andrews G
Milner A
Nettis MA
Lawrence AJ
van der Windt DA
Riley RD
Source :
The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science [Br J Psychiatry] 2024 Sep; Vol. 225 (3), pp. 379-388.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: A clinical tool to estimate the risk of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) in people with first-episode psychosis (FEP) would inform early detection of TRS and overcome the delay of up to 5 years in starting TRS medication.<br />Aims: To develop and evaluate a model that could predict the risk of TRS in routine clinical practice.<br />Method: We used data from two UK-based FEP cohorts (GAP and AESOP-10) to develop and internally validate a prognostic model that supports identification of patients at high-risk of TRS soon after FEP diagnosis. Using sociodemographic and clinical predictors, a model for predicting risk of TRS was developed based on penalised logistic regression, with missing data handled using multiple imputation. Internal validation was undertaken via bootstrapping, obtaining optimism-adjusted estimates of the model's performance. Interviews and focus groups with clinicians were conducted to establish clinically relevant risk thresholds and understand the acceptability and perceived utility of the model.<br />Results: We included seven factors in the prediction model that are predominantly assessed in clinical practice in patients with FEP. The model predicted treatment resistance among the 1081 patients with reasonable accuracy; the model's C-statistic was 0.727 (95% CI 0.723-0.732) prior to shrinkage and 0.687 after adjustment for optimism. Calibration was good (expected/observed ratio: 0.999; calibration-in-the-large: 0.000584) after adjustment for optimism.<br />Conclusions: We developed and internally validated a prediction model with reasonably good predictive metrics. Clinicians, patients and carers were involved in the development process. External validation of the tool is needed followed by co-design methodology to support implementation in early intervention services.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1472-1465
Volume :
225
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39101211
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2024.101