Views and perceptions of advanced life support practitioners on initiating, withholding and terminating resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the Emergency Medical Services of South Africa.

Introduction: This study aimed to explore the views and perceptions of Advanced Life Support (ALS) practitioners in two South African provinces on initiating, withholding, and terminating resuscitation in OHCA.
Methodology: Semi-structured one-on-one interviews were conducted with operational ALS practitioners working within the prehospital setting in the Western Cape and Free State provinces. Recorded interviews were transcribed and subjected to inductive-dominant, manifest content analysis. After familiarisation with the data, meaning units were condensed, codes were applied and collated into categories that were then assessed, reviewed, and refined repeatedly.
Results: A total of 18 ALS providers were interviewed. Five main categories were developed from the data analysis: 1) assessment of prognosis, 2) internal factors affecting decision-making, 3) external factors affecting decision-making, 4) system challenges, and 5) ideas for improvement. Factors influencing the assessment of prognosis were history, clinical presentation, and response to resuscitation. Internal factors affecting decision-making were driven by emotion and contemplation. External factors affecting decision-making included family, safety, and disposition. System challenges relating to bystander response and resources were identified. Ideas for improvement in training and support were brought forward.
Conclusion: Many factors influence OHCA decision-making in the Western Cape and Free State provinces, and numerous system challenges have been identified. The findings of this study can be used as a frame of reference for prehospital emergency care personnel and contribute to the development of context-specific guidelines.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(© 2024 The Authors.)