Back to Search Start Over

General anaesthesia compared to conscious sedation for first-time atrial fibrillation catheter ablation-a Danish nationwide cohort study.

Authors :
Riis-Vestergaard LD
Tønnesen J
Ruwald MH
Zörner CR
Middelfart C
Hein R
Johannessen A
Hansen J
Worck RH
Gislason G
Hansen ML
Source :
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology [Europace] 2024 Aug 03; Vol. 26 (8).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Aims: Catheter ablation (CA) is a well-established treatment option for atrial fibrillation (AF), where sedation and analgesia are pivotal for patient comfort and lesion formation. The impact of anaesthesia type on AF recurrence rates remains uncertain. This study aimed to examine AF recurrence rates depending on conscious sedation (CS) vs. general anaesthesia (GA) during CA.<br />Methods and Results: Utilizing nationwide data from the Danish healthcare registries, we conducted this cohort study involving adults (≥18 years) undergoing first-time CA for AF between 2010 and 2018. Patients were categorized by anaesthesia type (CS or GA), with the primary endpoint being AF recurrence, defined by a composite endpoint of either antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) prescriptions, AF-related hospital admissions, electrical cardioversions, or AF re-ablation. The impact of anaesthesia type was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis. The study cohort comprised 7957 (6421 CS and 1536 GA) patients. Persistent AF, hypertension, and heart failure, as well as use of AAD, were more prevalent in the GA group. Cumulative incidences of recurrent AF were higher in the CS group at 1 (46% vs. 37%) and at 5 (68% vs. 63%) years. Multivariate analysis revealed CS as significantly associated with increased risk of AF recurrence at 5-year follow-up [hazard ratio 1.26 (95% confidence interval 1.15-1.38)], consistent across paroxysmal and persistent AF subtypes.<br />Conclusion: This nationwide cohort study suggests a higher risk of AF recurrence with CS during CA compared to GA. These results advocate for considering GA as the preferred anaesthesia type for improved CA outcomes.<br />Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: L.D.R.-V., J.T., C.R.Z., C.M., R.H., A.J., R.H.W., G.G.: none. M.H.R.: Speaker honoraria from Boston Scientific and CardioFocus. J.H.: Speaker fees and consultant honoraria from Boston Scientific and Biosense Webster. M.L.H.: Received research grants from Biosense Webster and Medtronic.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-2092
Volume :
26
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39106218
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae203