Back to Search
Start Over
Erenumab versus topiramate: migraine-related disability, impact and health-related quality of life.
- Source :
-
European journal of neurology [Eur J Neurol] 2024 Dec; Vol. 31 (12), pp. e16437. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 12. - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background and Purpose: HER-MES was the first head-to-head study of erenumab against topiramate (standard of care). This post hoc analysis of the HER-MES study evaluated the effect of erenumab versus topiramate on patient-reported outcomes at week 24.<br />Methods: Adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine (n = 777) were randomized (1:1) to monthly subcutaneous erenumab (n = 389) or daily oral topiramate (n = 388). Migraine-related disability, as measured by the Headache Impact Test 6 (HIT-6) and Short Form 36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2), was analysed in the entire study cohort and true completers.<br />Results: In the erenumab group (vs. topiramate), significant improvements were reported in Headache Impact Test 6 total scores (composite populations, -10.88 vs. -7.72; true completers, -11.92 vs. -10.61) and a higher proportion of patients achieved a ≥5-point reduction from baseline with erenumab (composite populations, 72.2% vs. 53.9%; true completers, 79.64% vs. 71.43%). The adjusted mean change from baseline in the SF-36v2 score was greater with erenumab for both physical component summary (composite population, 5.48 vs. 3.63; true completers, 5.95 vs. 5.23) and mental component summary (composite populations, 1.00 vs. -1.18; true completers, 1.74 vs. -0.33). A higher proportion of patients on erenumab versus topiramate had a ≥5-point improvement in SF-36v2 for the physical component summary (composite populations, 47.7% vs. 37.4%; true completers, 52.1% vs. 48.9%) and mental component summary (composite populations, 25.3% vs. 16.8%; true completers, 27.3% vs. 17.7%).<br />Conclusions: This post hoc analysis demonstrated that patients treated with erenumab had significant improvements in headache impact and quality of life as measured by patient-reported outcomes versus patients treated with topiramate.<br /> (© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Female
Adult
Male
Middle Aged
Treatment Outcome
Fructose analogs & derivatives
Fructose therapeutic use
Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonists therapeutic use
Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonists pharmacology
Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonists administration & dosage
Double-Blind Method
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Topiramate therapeutic use
Topiramate pharmacology
Topiramate administration & dosage
Migraine Disorders drug therapy
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized administration & dosage
Quality of Life
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1468-1331
- Volume :
- 31
- Issue :
- 12
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- European journal of neurology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 39132915
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.16437