Back to Search Start Over

Corticosteroid Infiltration to Treat Shoulder Stiffness After Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors :
Saade F
Liotard JP
Godenèche A
Source :
Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty [J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast] 2024 Aug 02; Vol. 8, pp. 24715492241266096. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 02 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether the preoperative shoulder range of motion (ROM), would increase the risk of postoperative shoulder stiffness, or whether it would be associated with other preoperative patient characteristics.<br />Methods: The authors retrospectively analysed the 372 shoulders that underwent rotator cuff repair by 4 surgeons, between January 2010 and January 2011. All patients were followed up at 3 and 6 months by 2 independent observers to collect the ROM, including active forward elevation (AFE), passive forward elevation (PFE), and external rotation (ER), as well as subjective shoulder value (SSV).<br />Results: Of the initial cohort of 372 patients, 10 were lost to follow-up (2.7%), leaving a final cohort of 362 patients available for outcome assessment at a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Of the 362 patients, 281 did not require corticosteroid infiltration, 68 received corticosteroid infiltrations for shoulder stiffness with no apparent cause, and 13 received corticosteroid infiltrations for other reasons. None of the variables were associated with infiltration for shoulder stiffness. Older patients had greater SSV scores (β = 0.3; 95% CI [0.1, 0.6]; P  = .015), while both manual and repetitive workers had lower SSV scores (β = -10.7; 95% CI [-15.8, -5.6]; P  < .001, and β = -10.2; 95% CI [-15.1, -5.3]; P  < .001).<br />Conclusion: Postoperative SSV was significantly associated with age, as well as manual or repetitive work. Furthermore, postoperative PFE, AFE, and ER were significantly associated with preoperative PFE. Finally, at 3 and 6 months postoperative, patients who required infiltration for shoulder stiffness had significantly lower PFE, AFE, and ER compared to patients who did not require infiltration.<br />Level of Evidence: IV, Case series.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2024.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2471-5492
Volume :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39139992
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/24715492241266096