Back to Search Start Over

Rationalizing risk aversion in science: Why incentives to work hard clash with incentives to take risks.

Authors :
Gross K
Bergstrom CT
Source :
PLoS biology [PLoS Biol] 2024 Aug 15; Vol. 22 (8), pp. e3002750. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 15 (Print Publication: 2024).
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Scientific research requires taking risks, as the most cautious approaches are unlikely to lead to the most rapid progress. Yet, much funded scientific research plays it safe and funding agencies bemoan the difficulty of attracting high-risk, high-return research projects. Why don't the incentives for scientific discovery adequately impel researchers toward such projects? Here, we adapt an economic contracting model to explore how the unobservability of risk and effort discourages risky research. The model considers a hidden-action problem, in which the scientific community must reward discoveries in a way that encourages effort and risk-taking while simultaneously protecting researchers' livelihoods against the vicissitudes of scientific chance. Its challenge when doing so is that incentives to motivate effort clash with incentives to motivate risk-taking, because a failed project may be evidence of a risky undertaking but could also be the result of simple sloth. As a result, the incentives needed to encourage effort actively discourage risk-taking. Scientists respond by working on safe projects that generate evidence of effort but that don't move science forward as rapidly as riskier projects would. A social planner who prizes scientific productivity above researchers' well-being could remedy the problem by rewarding major discoveries richly enough to induce high-risk research, but in doing so would expose scientists to a degree of livelihood risk that ultimately leaves them worse off. Because the scientific community is approximately self-governing and constructs its own reward schedule, the incentives that researchers are willing to impose on themselves are inadequate to motivate the scientific risks that would best expedite scientific progress.<br />Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.<br /> (Copyright: © 2024 Gross, Bergstrom. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1545-7885
Volume :
22
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
PLoS biology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39146266
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002750