The effect of gestational diabetes mellitus on postnatal mother-infant bonding: Findings from the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study.

Purpose: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common complication of pregnancy and is associated with considerable psychological burden for women. In qualitative research, women with GDM describe increased awareness about their bonding with their infant, potentially resulting from the highly medicalised nature of the condition. The primary aim was to examine quantitatively whether GDM was associated with lower mother-infant bonding in the postnatal period.
Methods: Data were analysed from 10,419 women who participated in the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study from 2013 to 2017 in Japan. GDM status was collected from hospital records and measured using the oral glucose tolerance test. Mother-infant bonding was assessed using the Japanese version of the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS-J) at one-month postpartum, higher scores representing lower bonding. Data were analysed in SAS using multiple regression adjusting for relevant confounders.
Results: GDM did not appear to be associated with worse mother-infant bonding scores at one-month postpartum. There was a non-significant unadjusted trend in the mean mother-infant bonding scores (1.43(SD=1.11) versus (1.75(SD1.71)), and the proportion with bonding disorder (n = 4 (4.12%) versus n = 969 (9.39%)) in the GDM versus non GDM group respectively, indicating higher self-reported bonding in the GDM group. This remained not statistically significant in the adjusted analyses.
Conclusions: We observed the reverse of our hypothesis, that there was a trend for women with GDM to self-report higher bonding compared to non-GDM women. There is need to replicate this finding in cohorts specifically designed to measure GDM-specific psychological distress.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)