Back to Search
Start Over
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy after intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.
- Source :
-
Journal of vascular surgery [J Vasc Surg] 2025 Jan; Vol. 81 (1), pp. 261-267.e2. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 17. - Publication Year :
- 2025
-
Abstract
- Background: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is the mainstay of treatment for patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke, whereas carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is indicated in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. However, the impact of prior IVT on the outcomes of CEA (IVT-CEA) is not clear. The aim of this study was to determine whether IVT may create additional stroke and death risk for CEA, compared with CEA performed in the absence of a history of recent IVT, and to determine the optimal timing for CEA after IVT.<br />Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the outcomes of IVT-CEA vs CEA, using the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases.<br />Results: We included 11 retrospective comparative studies, in which 135,644 patients underwent CEA and 2070 underwent IVT-CEA. The pooled rate of perioperative stroke was 4.2% in the IVT-CEA group and 1.3% in the CEA group (odds ratio [OR], 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-1.58; P = .21), with a high heterogenicity (I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 93%). The rate of stroke/death was 5.9% in patients undergoing IVT-CEA 1.9% in those receiving CEA only (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.15-1.14; I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 92%; P = .09); after exclusion of studies including TIA as presenting symptom, stroke/death risk was 3.6% in IVT-CEA and 3.0% in CEA (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.80-2.53; I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 50%; P = .11). The risk of stoke decreased with a delay in the performance of CEA (P = .268). Using results of the metaregression, the calculated delay of CEA that allows for a <6% risk was 4.6 days. Compared with CEA, patients undergoing IVT-CEA had a significantly higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage (2.5% vs 0.1%; OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.06-0.21; I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 28%; P < .001) and neck hematoma requiring reintervention (3.6% vs 2.3%; OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43-0.85; I <superscript>2</superscript>  = 0%; P = .003).<br />Conclusions: In patients presenting with an acute ischemic stroke, CEA can be safely performed after a prior endovenous thrombolysis, maintaining a stroke/death risk of <6%. After IVT, CEA should be deferred for ≥5 days to minimize the risk for intracranial hemorrhage and neck bleeding.<br />Competing Interests: Disclosures None.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Humans
Treatment Outcome
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Risk Assessment
Male
Aged
Female
Administration, Intravenous
Middle Aged
Time-to-Treatment
Endarterectomy, Carotid adverse effects
Endarterectomy, Carotid mortality
Ischemic Stroke mortality
Ischemic Stroke diagnosis
Ischemic Stroke etiology
Thrombolytic Therapy adverse effects
Thrombolytic Therapy mortality
Carotid Stenosis mortality
Carotid Stenosis complications
Carotid Stenosis surgery
Carotid Stenosis therapy
Fibrinolytic Agents adverse effects
Fibrinolytic Agents administration & dosage
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1097-6809
- Volume :
- 81
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of vascular surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 39159889
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.014