Back to Search Start Over

CDK4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy vs. placebo plus endocrine therapy for HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: a phase III RCTs based meta-analysis.

Authors :
Luo C
Yu K
Luo X
Lian T
Liu X
Xu W
Jin Z
Source :
BMC cancer [BMC Cancer] 2024 Aug 21; Vol. 24 (1), pp. 1031. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 21.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Does incorporating Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors into endocrine therapy (ET) effectively enhance survival outcomes, notably overall survival (OS), among individuals with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer? This remains a clinical controversy. We compared the antitumor efficacy and adverse effects (AEs) between CDK4/6 inhibitors + ET (CET) and placebo + ET (PET) by conducting a phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) based meta-analysis.<br />Methods: Seven databases were searched to identify eligible studies, comprising Phase III RCTs comparing CET to PET. The primary endpoints were OS and progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including responses and adverse events (AEs).<br />Results: Seven RCTs (DAWNA-2, MONALEESA-2, MONALEESA-3, MONALEESA-7, MONARCH-3, PALOMA-2, and PALOMA-4) were included. The CET group exhibited significantly improved OS (HR: 0.81 [0.74, 0.88]), PFS (HR: 0.57 [0.52, 0.63]), objective response rate (RR: 1.31 [1.20, 1.43]), and clinical benefit rate (RR: 1.11 [1.07, 1.15]). These benefits were consistent across almost all subgroups. Additionally, the CET group showed better overall survival rates (OSR) from 24 to 60 months (OSR 24-60 m) and progression-free survival rates (PFSR) from 6 to 60 months (PFSR 6-60 m). However, more total AEs, grade 3-5 AEs, and serious AEs were found in CET group. The top 5 grade 3-5 AEs in the CET group were neutropenia (59.39%), leukopenia (24.11%), decreased white blood cell count (12.99%), hypertension (7.03%), and increased alanine aminotransferase (5.91%).<br />Conclusions: The superiority of CET over PET in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer is evident, showing improved survival and responses. Nonetheless, the higher incidence of AEs, specifically hematologic AEs, requires cautious attention.<br /> (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1471-2407
Volume :
24
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMC cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39169295
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12782-w