Back to Search Start Over

Comparative Evaluation of the Survival Rates of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Restorations Using Bilayer Technique along with Nanofilled Coating in Primary Molars: A Clinical Study.

Authors :
Khan N
Garg N
Pathivada L
Yeluri R
Source :
International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry [Int J Clin Pediatr Dent] 2024 Apr; Vol. 17 (Suppl 1), pp. S55-S60.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Objective: To enhance the survival rate of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations using (class I and class II) bilayer technique of placing glass ionomer cement (GIC) along with nanofilled coating (NC) over the restorations, thereby improving longevity.<br />Study Design: A total of 178 primary molars in 67 children were selected and randomly divided into four groups. Group IA was treated with a single layer of GIC, followed by a protective layer of petroleum jelly in class I restoration. Group IB was treated with a single layer of GIC, followed by a protective layer of petroleum jelly in class II restoration. Group IIA was treated with bilayer GIC restoration followed by NC of GC-Coat Plus in class I, whereas group IIB was treated with bilayer GIC restoration followed by GC-Coat Plus in class II. Clinical analysis of all three groups was performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months to evaluate the success of treatment procedures using predetermined criteria. Pearson's Chi-square and Kaplan-Meier estimates were utilized to evaluate the success of all four treatment procedures ( p < 0.05).<br />Results: Out of 178 teeth, 33 teeth were in group IA, 36 teeth were in group IB, 43 teeth were in group IIA, and 40 teeth were available for evaluation at the end of the 12-month follow-up period. The overall success was determined to be 81% for group IA, 79.2% for group IB, 79.5% for group IIA, and 88.6% for IIB. At 6th-month follow-up, one clinical failure was observed in groups IA and IB. At 9 months follow-up, two clinical failures were observed in both group IA and group IB and three failures were observed in group IIB. At 12 months follow-up, four clinical failures were observed in group IA, three in group IB and one clinical failure was observed in group IIB. There was no statistically significant difference observed between the success of the four groups, suggesting that either of the techniques can be utilized for ART.<br />Conclusion: No statistically significant difference was observed between the survival of class I and class II restorations of both the groups, indicating that either single-layer or bilayer technique along with NC can be adopted for the management of dental caries in primary molars using the ART approach.<br />How to Cite This Article: Khan N, Garg N, Garg N, et al. Comparative Evaluation of the Survival Rates of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Restorations Using Bilayer Technique along with Nanofilled Coating in Primary Molars: A Clinical Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(S-1):S55-S60.<br />Competing Interests: Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: NoneConflict of interest: None<br /> (Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0974-7052
Volume :
17
Issue :
Suppl 1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39185264
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2811