Back to Search
Start Over
The i-view® Video Laryngoscope Compared With the Macintosh Laryngoscope Does Not Enhance the Endotracheal Intubation Skills of Dental Students.
- Source :
-
Cureus [Cureus] 2024 Aug 07; Vol. 16 (8), pp. e66400. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 07 (Print Publication: 2024). - Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Background A disposable i-view <superscript>®</superscript> video laryngoscope (Intersurgical Limited, Berkshire, United Kingdom) is yet to be used to educate medical and dental students, who must learn endotracheal intubation skills. Additionally, the advantage of the i-view <superscript>®</superscript> use for the purpose, compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope, is unknown. We aimed to first determine whether the i-view <superscript>®</superscript> video laryngoscope enhances endotracheal intubation skills among dental students compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Methodology A prospective, observational, simulation study was conducted among 67 dental students in their sixth clinical year of education. Intubation skills were evaluated on a computer-assisted simulator with a standardized manikin. Each student was asked to intubate using the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope and the i-view <superscript>®</superscript> video laryngoscope in the trachea of the simulator's manikin. We collected objective data, including the retroflection angle of the manikin, the maxillary incisor contact pressure, time from picking up the laryngoscope to ventilation, intubation success, and intubation delay. Each student was further asked to grade their subjective evaluation concerning the visual field, Cormack and Lehane classification, operability, stability, needed force for intubation, and easiness during intubation. Results Enrolled dental students quoted that the i-view <superscript>®</superscript> video laryngoscope demonstrated better visual field, Cormack and Lehane classification, operability, and stability than the Macintosh laryngoscope. However, they felt intubation easiness could have been better using Macintosh than i-view <superscript>®</superscript> . Intubation time, failure rate, and delay rate did not differ between the two laryngoscopes. Nevertheless, the maxillary incisor contact pressure (median interquartile range (IQR)) during the intubation increased in the i-view <superscript>®</superscript> intubation compared with Macintosh (32 (24 to 41) vs. 25 (18 to 35) N, p = 0.010). Conclusions We first demonstrated that the i-view <superscript>®</superscript> video laryngoscope compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope does not enhance the endotracheal intubation skills of dental students. However, the possible repeated use as an educational simulator training tool may add some advantages to the experience of video laryngoscope in both medical and dental students.<br />Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Clinical Research Review Board of Tokushima University issued approval jRCTs062220047. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.<br /> (Copyright © 2024, Takata et al.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2168-8184
- Volume :
- 16
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Cureus
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 39246974
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.66400