Difference in cardiac response after transcatheter aortic valve implantation according to flow and gradient pattern.

Aims: In patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for severe aortic stenosis (AS), data on the differences in subsequent cardiac structure and function among stratified groups with flow gradient patterns through the aortic valve are insufficient.
Methods and Results: In this large multicenter study, 4523 patients undergoing TAVI for severe AS between 2013 and 2019 were divided into three groups according to the following criteria: (i) high-gradient AS (HG-AS) [mean pressure gradient (MPG) ≥ 40 mmHg], (ii) classical low-flow low-gradient AS (cLFLG-AS) [MPG < 40 mmHg, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%], and (iii) paradoxical low-flow low-gradient AS (pLFLG-AS) [MPG < 40 mmHg, LVEF ≥ 50% but stroke volume index (SVi) <35 mL/m2]. Echocardiography was performed at baseline, post-procedure, and 1 year post-TAVI. 3697, 507, and 319 patients had HG-AS, cLFLG-AS, and pLFLG-AS, respectively. After adjusting for clinical factors, cLFLG-AS and pLFLG-AS had an ∼1.5-fold higher 2-year all-cause mortality compared with HG-AS. During 1 year following TAVI, compared with HG-AS, cLFLG-AS showed greater reduction of LV systolic diameter (LVDs) and LV diastolic diameter (LVDd) and greater increase of LVEF (P < 0.001 for all), and changes in LV mass index (LVMi) and SVi were comparable (P = 0.915 and P = 0.821, respectively). However, pLFLG-AS demonstrated less reduction of LVDs and LVDd (P = 0.039 and P = 0.001, respectively), less improvement of LVEF and LVMi (P = 0.045 and P < 0.001, respectively), and comparable change in SVi (P = 0.364).
Conclusion: During 1 year post-TAVI, compared with HG-AS, cLFLG-AS achieves smaller LV diameters, greater increase in LVEF, and comparable regression of LVMi, whereas pLFLG-AS does not.
Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: Dr Izumo is a screening proctor for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Yashima, Dr Ohno, and Dr Asami are clinical proctors for Medtronic. Dr Takagi, Dr Naganuma, Dr Mizutani, and Dr Ueno are clinical proctors for Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic. Dr Yamamoto, Dr Shirai, Dr Tada, Dr Watanabe, and Dr Hayashida, are clinical proctors for Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Medical, and Medtronic. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.
(© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)