Back to Search Start Over

Cell throughput and performance ratio as quality indicators on hematopoietic stem cell apheresis: A single-center experience.

Authors :
Castillo-Aleman YM
Villegas-Valverde CA
Bencomo-Hernandez AA
Ventura-Carmenate Y
Lumame S
Castelo C
Al-Saadawi NA
Abu-Haleeqa MI
El-Najjar I
Al-Kaabi FM
Source :
Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis [Transfus Apher Sci] 2024 Dec; Vol. 63 (6), pp. 104003. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 10.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Benchmarking in CD34 <superscript>+</superscript> cell apheresis is crucial for optimizing resources, ensuring consistent collection performance, and ultimately, decision-making algorithms to improve donor safety. Key performance indicators such as the "performance ratio" (PR) are applied routinely in some apheresis centers, whereas this report identifies the "cell throughput" (CT) as another quality indicator in apheresis.<br />Material and Methods: This single-center study includes retrospective data from 117 aphereses. CT and PR were calculated based on the mononuclear cell collection (MNC) or continuous mononuclear cell collection (cMNC) protocols of the Spectra Optia® apheresis system, types of venous access, transplant settings, and mobilization regimens.<br />Results: CTs (× 10 <superscript>6</superscript> CD34 <superscript>+</superscript> cells/min) were found to be greater in cMNC compared to MNC protocols (1.4 vs. 1.0, p = 0.0037), in allogeneic versus autologous (1.3 vs. 1.1, p = 0.0274), and in the mobilization regimen of G-CSF alone versus the G-CSF combined (1.3 vs. 1.0, p = 0.0249). In contrast, PR (%) was only statistically significant in favor of the cMNC protocol (213.0 vs. 186.8 for MNC).<br />Conclusions: CT and PR are feasible quality indicators on CD34 <superscript>+</superscript> cell apheresis, are easy to calculate and implement, and have clinical and administrative implications. Analyzing CT and PR may strengthen the institutional criteria for selecting cMNC or MNC protocols; they may also be used to evaluate the performance of new personnel or cell separator devices or, eventually, trigger investigations for those aphereses under-collected by specific thresholds.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1473-0502
Volume :
63
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39265224
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2024.104003