Back to Search Start Over

Arterial inflammation on [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT in melanoma patients treated with and without immune checkpoint inhibitors: CHECK-FLAME I.

Authors :
Polomski EAS
Kapiteijn EW
Heemelaar JC
van der Kolk AV
Kalisvaart TM
van de Burgt A
Dibbets-Schneider P
van Velden FHP
Seijkens TTP
Stöger JL
Jukema JW
de Geus-Oei LF
Antoni ML
Source :
Atherosclerosis [Atherosclerosis] 2024 Nov; Vol. 398, pp. 118595. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Sep 07.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background and Aims: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) revolutionized cancer treatment. However, ICIs may increase the immune response to non-tumor cells, possibly resulting in increased arterial inflammation, raising the risk of atherosclerotic events. Nevertheless, malignancies may induce a pro-inflammatory state and the association between ICIs and arterial inflammation remains to be clarified. This study aims to assess differences in increase in arterial inflammation between patients with advanced melanoma treated with ICIs compared to a control group without ICIs.<br />Methods: Patients with advanced melanoma who underwent [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]FDG PET/CT scans at baseline, 6 months (T1) and 18 months (T2) were included in this retrospective observational study. Arterial inflammation was evaluated in eight segments by calculating the target-to-background ratio (TBR). The primary study outcome was the difference in increase in mean TBR <subscript>max</subscript> between patients treated with and without ICIs.<br />Results: We included 132 patients of whom 72.7 % were treated with ICIs. After exclusion for the use of anti-inflammatory medication, patients treated with ICIs showed a significant increase in mean TBR <subscript>max</subscript> between baseline and T1 from 1.29 ± 0.12 to 1.33 ± 0.13 (p = 0.017), while in the control group, no change in mean TBR <subscript>max</subscript> (1.30 ± 0.12 to 1.28 ± 0.10, p = 0.22) was observed (p = 0.027). During longer follow-up, mean TBR <subscript>max</subscript> remained stable in both groups. Arterial inflammation increased significantly after ICI therapy in patients without active inflammation (p < 0.001) and in patients without calcifications (p = 0.013).<br />Conclusions: A significant increase in arterial inflammation as measured on [ <superscript>18</superscript> F]FDG PET/CT was observed in patients with advanced melanoma treated with ICIs only in the first six months after initiation of therapy, whereas no changes were observed in the control group. Moreover, arterial inflammation was mainly increased in patients without pre-existing inflammatory activity and with non-calcified lesions.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-1484
Volume :
398
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Atherosclerosis
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39307054
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2024.118595